Some angry comments I gathered on the Internet:

“Obama will NOT get my vote, and one step more,” Ellen Thorp, a 59-year-old flight attendant from Houston told me. “I have been a Democrat for 38 years. As of today, I am registering as an independent. Yee Haw!”

Jean B. Grillo, an “over 50″ writer in lower Manhattan, was pretty straightforward: “I am so tired as a white, ultra-liberal, McGovern-voting, civil-rights marching, anti-war fighting highly educated professional woman who totally supports Hillary Clinton to be attacked and vilified as racist and or dumb.”

Shauna Morris, a 44-year-old lawyer from Largo, Fla., said, “I am upper-middle class, and I still can’t stand him — and it has nothing to do with race, believe me.”

“Many of us feel slighted,” said Lynn Eyrich Harvey, 76, from Los Gatos, Calif. “We feel that years of supporting the party is unimportant, that we are to sit down and shut up — but be sure to vote Democratic in November.”

“How Obama’s campaign has treated Hillary will not be forgotten,” Janet Rogers, 55, who runs a Bed and Breakfast in Medina, Ohio. “I will vote for McCain if Hillary is not the nominee. My husband and friends all feel the same way.”

.
.
.
.
.

LOL!

If you look at my postings on this blog, one thing is clear — I do not dislike Hillary as a person. I do dislike her tactics — race-baiting and so forth…

If she had beaten Obama fairly, I would have supported her unconditionally — for Republicans are FILTHY SLIME no human being in their right mind should support.

Hillary was not beaten by Obama with the help of the press for she had “FOX ‘Bigot’ News” plus numerous right-wing radio pundits pontificating to whites “frightened of black men” working for her, while MSNBC and left-wing radio favored Obama.

She just lost, plain and simple — to a better prepared candidate. Her arrogance, disorganization, lack of foresight and sense of entitlement did her in…and here are some more reasons why she lost.

…and by the way, there are millions of females, especially younger ones supporting Obama….why not you?

This prompts me to ask the question: “What the heck is the matter with these women?“…Obama has been a gentleman all through!

It seems to me that some of these women have taken the “I get the house and the children ’syndrome,’” a common divorce settlement in American courts too far!

…or is it Feminism taken too far? Here is something to chew on.

Obama has his work cut out for him — calming down millions of irate, sometimes dumb and racist white women.

It will be a very difficult task after the deranged narcissism exhibited by Ma. Clinton during this just concluded “Silly” primary season!

Ladies, remember to THINK before you cast your ballot in November — Your only other options will be McDUMB, McWarMonger, McSAME, McBUSH, McTHUG, McReTHUGlican and McBOMB….who sincerely believe in the following: click here to read

The just concluded democratic primary was not an episode of “Divorce Court,” rather it was a contest leading to the election of the most “powerful person” in the world — Obama floored the Clinton machine amidst “assassination threats,” blatant racism and rampant mis-information — fired from all directions, and he fully deserves to compete in the grand finale — in November, against ReTHUGlican John McBOMB.

By the way, Hillary gave a very strong speech today, and hopefully she will follow up to help Obama get elected.

If she follows up effectively, all will be forgiven. If she doesn’t and Obama is defeated because of her “White Female” core constituency — she better remember that in 2012(if she decides to run again) she may experience multiple episodes of “Angry Black Females,” “Angry Black Men,” “Angry Left-Wing Liberals” and “Angry Young Males and Females - White & Black” — Obama’s core constituency.

My guns are now aimed squarely at the forehead of McDUMB ….who by the way, and I sincerely believe, is not a bad man, but the thought of victory for Right-Wing ReTHUGlicanism just makes me want to puke!

Popularity: 27% [?]

By: Prof. Ken Bode

Prof. Ken Bode
Today, 80 percent of Americans think our country is on the wrong track.

With a cratering economy, an endless war in Iraq and an uncomprehending president, that is understandable. Rarely has there been a moment when clarity of choice and opportunity for change has been so clear.

On Tuesday, Indiana voters have a monumental opportunity to help set our country on a new course.

I have cast an early vote for Sen. Barack Obama, and I’ll tell you why.

In the Democratic primary, the choice is between experience and judgment. For all the experience she extols, Hillary Clinton still carries the albatross of her opportunistic vote favoring the Iraq war. She explains lamely that she didn’t realize President Bush would take her blank check and cash it. Obama rightly opposed the war from the start.

Both candidates say they would get out of Iraq, but Obama would approach the necessary regional security arrangements in the Middle East by opening a dialogue with states like Syria and Iran, abandoning the stubborn silence of the Bush policies. Clinton approaches the problem with threats to obliterate Iran with “massive retaliation.” Her rhetoric is drawn from the Cold War past, revealing the “bring-them-on” mentality of Bush.

Overall, Obama represents the best chance we have to address the greatest threat facing America, the stateless terrorism of the Islamic world. As The Atlantic magazine’s Andrew Sullivan said, if you seek the simplest and most effective weapon against the demonization of America that fuels Islamist ideology, Obama’s face gets close. It proves them wrong about America in ways no words can. Obama’s mere presence in the Oval Office would help defuse anti-American passions around the world.

The electorate also is hungry for change in the way our government does business at home. Clinton has more experience in Washington, but that has not helped her to understand its problems. She solicits money from special interests and picked a major lobbyist to run her campaign. Judging by their different policies, Obama’s shorter time in Washington is more an asset than a handicap.

The most important reason that Indiana voters should support Obama on Tuesday is that he represents America’s greatest opportunity to pivot away from the past. While Clinton talks about change, Obama embodies it. He radiates a sense of possibility and has a proven ability to engage and inspire young people to public service like no candidate since John F. Kennedy. He has produced a nationwide surge of new voters, in itself an expression of the nation’s hunger for change. For the past 20 years, two families, the Bushes and Clintons, have run the country, longer than the newest voters — and many serving in Iraq — have been alive. Obama would change that.

Too late for many, Obama finally and firmly denounced the pronouncements of his preacher. Rev. Jeremiah Wright now takes his place in the pantheon of pastors who bring strange ideas from the pulpit to politics.

Bush supporter Rev. Jerry Falwell claimed the 9/11 attacks occurred because American secularism had forfeited God’s protection.

Rudy Giuliani backer Pat Robertson claimed that accepting homosexuality could result in earthquakes, tornados and a possible meteor. And John McCain’s supporter, televangelist John Hagee, said Hurricane Katrina was God’s punishment for a New Orleans gay rights parade. Politicians cannot be held responsible for the crazy rantings of preachers.

Voters also must remember that the Clintons represent a partnership of endless uncertainty. Bill Clinton squandered the last two years of his presidency by recklessly dallying with Monica Lewinsky, producing impeachment, and jeopardizing the election of Al Gore. Had that not happened, America would not be in Iraq today. In our choice on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton clearly represent the past, a page turned backward, and Barack Obama represents the future.

While endorsing Obama, a former Clinton administration official put it this way: “I don’t think I’m ready for the circus to come back to town.”

About The Author: Ken A. Bode is the Pulliam Professor of Journalism at DePauw University and a Hudson adjunct fellow. His academic career includes being the John S. and James L. Knight Professor of Journalism as well as the Dean of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University from 1998 to 2002; a John L. Hughes University Professor and Director of the Center for Contemporary Media at DePauw University from 1989 1997; and an assistant professor of political science at Michigan State University from 1965 to 1969 and at SUNY Binghamton from 1969 to 1970. Bode received his B.A. (cum laude) from the University of South Dakota in 1961 and his M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina.

Popularity: 29% [?]