By: Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
   [ Enlarge ]
Due to orchestrated misinformation which has been overwhelmingly diffused worldwide over many successive decades, the global public opinion has been left in mysteries as regards the root causes of the interminable Middle Eastern conflicts.

For the perpetrators of the misinformation campaign to achieve their targets, the easiest way was to create an entirely fake scene of theater with the opponents plunged in ignorance about their true identity. The introduction of new identities was not a process to be completed in a few years. In fact, it took more than one century to complete the preliminary stage.

Effectively, accurate information can be quickly and easily obtained by anyone seeking to understand the Oriental problem. Above all, it’s a problem of fallacious terms, fake identities, ideas projected on enemies, and prevailing confusion. In fact, the entire problem hinges on the Anglo-French colonialism and expansionism at the prejudice of the Ottoman Empire that before just 212 years controlled the entire are between Morocco and Iran, every territory between Caucasus and the Horn of Africa, and all lands stretching between Oman and Austria.

To destroy the Ottoman Empire, the Freemasonic, Anti-Christian regimes of England and France introduced a wide range of tactics, establishing a link between the academic disciplines of Humanities (mainly specialized in the various provinces of the Ottoman Empire, Iran and Mogul India) and the political – military intelligence. From this successfully financed project emanated many fake terms that did not exist before and are indeed by themselves meaningless.

These terms would subsequently be “exported” (along with the entirely fake interpretation of the past and present, which was coined as “Orientalism” and accommodated in many disciplines) to selected youth, mostly belonging in minorities and /or targeted ethno-religious groups; this colonial policy was geared to make the targeted groups believe a version of History totally opposite to the reality and absolutely unfavorable to the interests of the world Islam and the Ottoman Empire.

Exemplary fake terms are precisely the nonsensical “Middle East,” “Near East” and “Far East” that define vast circumferences as per their position with respect to another area, namely “Western Europe” which is considered — idiotically and discriminatorily — as the “center”. In fact, there is no Middle East; “Middle” as per what? “Near East” is another fake term to describe parts of the Ottoman Empire in Western Asia, and with more frequent use for periods of the Antiquity.

If fake geographical and chronological terms set the stage for chaos and drama, it is sure that fabricated ethnic / national terms make it possible for thunderstorms to gather.

Arabs vs. Israel: Two Fake Terms for a Century of Conflicts and Bloodshed

Most of the people allover the world imagine that all troubles in the so-called area of the Middle East are due to the Arab — Israeli conflict. There is no more inaccurate and more false perception of events and developments than this.

In fact, the so-called Arabs are not Arabs, and the so-called Israelis are totally unrelated from Israel.

This reality has been systematically kept under silence by the Anglo-French Freemasonic academia (the Orientalists) and diplomacy.

Arabs exist only in Hedjaz — There is no Arab outside Arabia.

In fact, throughout the Atlas (Morocco, Mauritania, Algeria and Tunisia), Libya, Niger and Mali, the totality of the local populations are Hamitic Berbers (Amazigh) and Tuaregs. Either they speak both languages, Amazigh and Arabic, or only one of them, they are Berbers who came to (eventually) learn Arabic because they accepted Islam. This phenomenon involved can therefore be described as linguistic arabization, and it has no impact on the ethnic or cultural levels.

Similarly, in Egypt, the bulk of the population are Egyptians, namely Copts who at a certain moment accepted Islam, and have been progressively arabized at the linguistic level.

The Nubians either in Egypt or in Sudan speak Nubian and Arabic, but have never been arabized; Arabic is merely their religious language.

The Sudanese Arabic speaking people (ca. half the country’s population) are not Arabs either; they are Kushites (indigenous in Ancient Sudan, which was called Ethiopia by the Greeks and the Romans) who, after being Christianized (4th — 5th century CE), progressively accepted Islam (9th — 16th century CE), and learned Arabic.

The Yemenites and the Omanis are not Arabic either; they are descendents of the Ancient Yemenites and Omanis, and Mahrani, Soqotri and Dhofari (the latter in Oman) are the surviving forms of the pre-Islamic Yemenite languages that have been mercilessly persecuted by Yemen’s and Oman’s colonial Pan-Arabist regimes in the same way Amazigh has been mosntrously discriminated in NW Africa.

Finally, the central part of the Ottoman provinces, today’s pseudo-states of Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and the Emirates are not inhabited by Arabs but Aramaeans who have been linguistically arabized following their islamization (7th — 18th century CE).

In all these cases, the different modern idioms used (and falsely called as Modern Arabic dialects) are different linguistic amalgamations of the aforementioned (different per area) indigenous languages with Arabic. Furthermore, the official languages used in the administration and the mass media originate from a fabricated form of Modern Arabic that was composed in the 19th and early 20th century in Egypt (the Ottoman province that was under colonial tutelage longer than any other). Useless to add, the various dialects are totally disdained as “slang” by the Pan-Arabist regimes, and consequently all these populations do not truly have a national language of their own.

Useless to add that ethnic amalgamation did not truly take place following the Islamic expansion, as the Freemasonic Anglo-French forgers have long pretended, because the Arabs, who moved out of Hedjaz and settled in various parts of the early Caliphate, were very few if compared with the local populations. The total population of Arabia at the times of Prophet Muhammad was less than the population of just one significant Egyptian, Aramaean, Persian or Roman city.

More insightful is offered here:

•   Falsehood of Pan-Arabism, Progenitor of Wars and Tyrannies

•   The Aramaeans’ rise will transfigure the Middle Eastern Chessboard

•   Islam: the Cultural Aramaization of the Arabs

•   Aramaeans vs. Arabs: The fight between Civilization and Barbarism within Islam

•   UN Reform and Languages: Strip Arabic from Undeserved Status

•   To Win over Terrorism, Eradicate Pan-Arabism and Tear Down the Arab League!

•   Pan-Arabism: the inhuman progenitor of Islamic Terrorism

•   Modern Arabic: the Anglo-French Tool of Islamic Terrorism Promotion

The so-called State of Israel is a fake; its correct name is Judah

On the other hand, the Jews who returned to Palestine according the Zionist plan have nothing to do with the Ancient Israelites, who after Solomon’s death (930 BCE) formed the Northern Hebrew state Israel with ten (10) tribes and capital at Samaria; the Jews are the descendents of the Southern Hebrew state Judah (with two tribes and capital at Jerusalem) that was taken to exile at Babylonia by Nebuchadnezzar (587 BCE), returned to Judea after the Persian invasion of Babylonia (539 BCE), setup a state (named Judah) that was finally annexed by the Romans, who after the suppression of the Jerusalem revolt, dispersed them out of that land.

Contrarily with the Jews, the Israelites, the ten tribes of the Northern state had been taken to exile by the monotheist emperor of Assyria Sharrukin, relocated at the north-easternmost confines of the Assyrian empire (721 BCE) and thence migrated to the northwest (ca. 640 BCE), along with the entire population of the Assyrians, who were the ruling elite of the immense empire. After the end of Assurbanipal’s reign (625 BCE), Assyria soon collapsed (614, 612, 609 BCE), and the invading Babylonian armies found only a few Assyrian garrisons. Assyrian was never written after 612 BCE because simply there were no Assyrian scribes and people in the wider area of Mesopotamia; the same is valid for the Israelites who remained known as the ten lost tribes. According to Biblical prophecies, they will return at the End of Times — but of course this concerns them, not the Jews who never lost their identity, language and religion.

As a matter of fact, the Biblical precision is absolutely sufficient of its own, and one needs vicious religious swindlers and preachers of Satan to manage to have it greatly altered and widely misunderstood.

The prefabricated pseudo-return of the Zionist Jews in Palestine has been totally disregarded by all Biblical prophecies that do not speak of it at all — in striking contrast with what preach today various Evangelicals and other pseudo-Christians who, hiding their evil Freemasonic identity, emphatically pretend that Christians have to be tolerant toward the Jews. Of course, these false prophets are disqualified by 2000 years of genuinely anti-Jewish Christianity, as a matter of fact, they deserve no further effort of refutation.

Further on the subject is to be found here:

Elizabeth II on the Throne of David and Solomon

Freemasonic Trickery “Arabs vs. Israel”: A 19th Century Machination

The Freemasonic Anglo-French plan of decomposition of the Ottoman Empire was the World History’s most execrable, most perverse, and most ominous plan and deed. In fact, it turned the vast area ruled in peace by the Ottoman Empire to an interminable chain of vicious conflicts, hysterical hatred, inhuman rancor, and bestial vindictiveness that will all be taken into account in the forthcoming, merciless dismantlement of the wicked, pseudo-Christian Western world.

The different inhabitants of the targeted and threatened Ottoman provinces, even if these provinces were detached for some time (illegal occupation of Egypt by the French in 1798 — illegal proclamation of vice-royalty by Muhammad Ali who was totally rejected by the entire religious establishment of Al Azhar and all the Egyptians — illegal disembark of the French at Algiers in 1830), would soon make revolution against the French (and their pseudo-enemies, the English who played their role hypocritically pretending to oppose the French but having in mind to further engulf the Ottoman Empire into wrong policies and catastrophic tactics) in order to eliminate the inimical presence from their lands.

To avert an indigenous reaction and revolution that would drive them away, and to plan for hundreds of years of supremacy and exploitation, the Anglo-French had to

a. systematically carry out practices of extensive financial corruption and bribery in order to force individuals with weak personality to deviate and betray their own country, e.g. the Ottoman Empire, and

b. compose a vast cultural — socio-behavioural — educational — academic — intellectual — ideological system of alteration that, without making of the locals true anthropological copies of the Anglo-French citizens (already devious from Christianity due to the already effectuated Freemasonic penetration of the Western European societies), would condemn them to a permanent socio-behavioural — educational — cultural — academic impasse that would later make the local societies explode.

Then started the extensive practice of “Bon pour l’ Orient” which means that for every sector of knowledge in Orientalism there would be three levels of conclusions:

1.   the disturbing truth — this would become known to the Anglo-French Freemasonic Orientalists, researchers and explorers but would be kept hidden for all the rest, due to its catastrophic impact for the Freemasonic olans, if publicly and widely admitted.

2.   the ordinary falsification of truth — this would be diffused / disclosed by the Freemasonic Orientalist scholars in order to become widely known as an element of academic knowledge, average education and public culture of the Western citizens; and

3.   the advanced distortion of the truth — this would be diffused among students originating from the colonized countries, detached provinces of the Ottoman Empire, African territories, Iran, India, China, etc., in order to make of them perfect tools in the hands of their dishonest professors and the respective diplomats back in the students’ countries; the latter would support the students and help them obtain positions in their own pseudo-countries in order to thus continue the “official” diffusion of the Orientalist distortion and associated theoretical falsehood.

The Fabrication of Pan-Arabism

Long before driving Michel Aflaq to the point of preaching Ba’athism and Arab nationalism (for those who were not Arabs), the Anglo-French Orientalists had to and did effectively create the fake “Arab” of theirs, in Alexandria, Algiers and Beirut first.

Before Napoleon’s arrival, no one among the various populations of the Ottoman Empire from Mosul to Khartoum and from Oman to Algiers considered themselves as Arabs, except of course the inhabitants of Hedjaz and the desert Najd; for more than two centuries (17th and 18th), numerous English and French travelers moved throughout the Ottoman Empire and reported about the prevailing situation in the vast territory.

It is not by coincidence that Napoleon traveled to Egypt (1798) secretively and accompanied by an unprecedented number of French scholars, researchers, explorers and engineers. The hit against the Ottoman Empire had been planned to be multifaceted. These same scholars examined the prevailing situation and compared it with the earlier collected data.

Islamic Disintegration and Ottoman Decadence due to Ibn Taimiya

Their conclusion was true; by miracle, Islam did not exist anymore! Certainly, the outright majority of the inhabitants were looking like Muslims, praying five times per day and fasting in Ramadan, but the driving force of the Islamic world, namely the Islamic science, the Islamic philosophy, the Islamic knowledge, the Islamic art had disappeared. In their place, a barbaric pseudo-theological system had become predominant, plunging the entire society into absolute barbarism, ignorance, disregard for the art, philosophy and knowledge, and — worse — hatred for science (even for what Islamic science had been for more than 1100 years). This minimalist, genuinely un-Islamic, system imposed total disrespect for the “Other” and, even more catastrophically, absolute indifference for what Islam had been as a theoretic — intellectual — cultural — academic system.

For the — apparently pseudo-Muslim — sheikhs who were in control of the widely analphabetic masses, this fake Islam was just limited in the Quran and the Hadith (Prophet Muhammad’s sermons and admonitions, interpretations and discourses). This paranoid system imposed a catastrophic “model,” namely the tiny and unimportant village of Mecca of the times of the Prophet, and not the greatness of Baghdad of Harun al Rashid or other magnificent centers acknowledged for scientific, cultural, intellectual and political supremacy and prestige at the times of the Islamic Golden Era, such as Seville, Granada, Samarqand, Kairouan, Ghazna, Maragheh, Caesarea, Ganja, Delhi, Cairo, Soltanieh, Bukhara, Shiraz, Esfahan, Konya, Damascus, etc. It was clear that the ignorant and uneducated sheikhs were determined to reduce their audience to absolute imbecility in order to easily control them. They therefore discredited by themselves and with no restrain the quasi-totality of the Islamic phenomenon that they ignored beforehand.

Certainly the environment around the Sultan in Istanbul was different, but the influence of these sheikhs was predominant there too, reducing every interest for science, knowledge, art and philosophy to extreme. It was clear that a very negative theological system had prevailed, eliminated all the rest, and threatened the entire phenomenon of Islamic Civilization with extinction and the imperial elite (the Sublime Porte) with overthrowing. Of course, they would never terminate the Caliphate, but by controlling the key position of Sheikhulislam and by getting involved in the education process of the Sultan’s sons, princes and crown princes, these ignorant, barbaric and virtually un-Islamic sheikhs could almost control the Ottoman Empire from within.

Today we know that this system started with Islam’s most idiotic, execrable and filthy “theologian” Ibn Taimiyah, a crypto-Christian who intentionally attempted to aptly de-Islamize and covertly Christianize Islam. Ibn Taimiyah’s imprisonment (based on accusations for anthropomorphism) is certainly one of the most unfortunate moments of the Islamic History; he should have been lynched in streets and cut to pieces alive as the worst enemy of the Islamic Civilization, and as a determined and accomplished Satanist.

It is questionable whether the early European travelers and Orientalists really identified the origins of the system they were confronted with in the daily life throughout the late 18th – early 19th century Ottoman Empire. But of course, this would matter little to them. What was of primordial importance was the fact that the situation offered them an otherwise unexpected and greatly important tool of decomposition of the Ottoman Empire.

The Projection of the Theory of Nation throughout the Ottoman Empire

To first destabilize and then destroy the Ottoman Empire, the Anglo-French Freemasons used the same tools that they had already used against the “absolutist” monarchies; the replacement of the concept of “subject” with that of “citizen,” and the diffusion of the early form of liberal (John Locke) and/or romantic (Johann Gottfried Herder) nationalism, which was closely associated with the theory of “public sovereignty”.

The imaginative concept of the “nation” was effectively used by the Anglo-French and their agents and puppets in the various targeted parts of the Ottoman Empire in order to create fictional nations that would be (due to their elites who were “educated” in Paris and London) perfect tools of destruction of the Ottoman Empire. In South Balkans, Albanians, Southern Slavs, and Vlachians were suitably described as “Greeks”. A modern Greek language was fabricated on the basis of the Common Alexandrian Greek dialect of the Late Antiquity (New Testament Greek) and brutally imposed on all the unfortunate populations that happened to be enclosed within the borders of the so-called “Greek” state in 1829.

The formation of the concept of ?Arab’ started in Alexandria after Muhammad Ali (an Albanian origin officer from the Macedonian province of the Ottoman Empire) was supported by the Anglo-French to covertly detach from Sultan’s control a land that was not his.

The concept of “Arab” incorporated all the socio-behavioural attributes that the Anglo-French Orientalists (had) attested in the local populations. Indeed, the socio-behavioural parameter of concept of “Arab” is far stronger than the linguistic one. This happens because the socio-behavioural parameter is an absolutely fictional element.

The socio-behavioural attributes of the populations first encountered by the Anglo-French Orientalists in Alexandria, Egypt and the Phoenician coast were

1.   neither original (Egyptian or Phoenician)

2.   nor Islamic (as attested in many places during the Golden Era of Islam)

3.   nor Arab (as attested in Arabia before Prophet Muhammad).

They were merely degenerated attributes and elements of a socio-behavioural system heavily influenced by the diffusion of the barbarizing system of Ibn Taimiya (1263 – 1328).

Here, it is essential to stress two critical points:

1. Due to the preaching of Islam by Prophet Muhammad among the Arabs, the marginal nation of Arabia have been culturally, religiously, spiritually, intellectually, and socio-behaviourally de-arabized and overwhelmingly aramaeanized (in the sense that the Aramaean culture and socio-behavioural system had incorporated Biblical and New Testamentary beliefs, narratives, concepts, ideals and values).

However, Muhammad failed to totally uproot the pre-Islamic barbarism of the Arabs (effectively coined as Jahiliyyah) and when rejection against the Prophet became impossible to utter (after Muhammad’s return to Mecca), the real opponents of Islam went hiding as Muslims and started diffusing (within Islamic theoretical context) various anti-Islamic concepts that were difficult to detect as they evolved around issues pertaining to Arab identity and socio-behavioural system.

2. For many centuries after Islam’s early diffusion, several concepts and elements of Arab identity and socio-behavioural system (considered as explicit barbarism by the true Muslims either they were of Arab or non-Arab origin) survived within Islam because they repeatedly became effective tools at the hands of Muslim theologians who were virtually anti-Islamic but dared not refute Islam in public. Amalgamated with a strong dose of conservatism, tribalism, and excessive anti-dialectical (kalam) theorizing, Ahmed ibn Hanbal’s system became the recipient of all anterior forms and surviving concepts of Arab socio-behavioural system.

Ahmed ibn Hanbal (780 – 855) was never considered as an important theologian while alive, back at the times of Islam’s Golden Era; he was marginal and despised as of extremely poor skills in philosophy; this was the reason of his anti-dialectical diatribes. He was imprisoned as he was considered as threat against the progress and the prosperity of the Islamic Caliphate, and as a menace for the Islamic Civilization. If he is today considered as the founder of one of the four important schools of Islamic Jurisprudence, this is due to the fact that Ibn Taimiya himself was a Hanbalite, and the diffusion of Ibn Taimiya theological doctrine strengthened the system from which it originated.

The aforementioned makes it clear that the socio-behavioural attributes of the populations that the Anglo-French Orientalists first encountered in 18th — 19th century Alexandria, Egypt and Phoenician coast were degenerated and perverted elements that constituted a dramatic drawback for the Islamic Civilization, an unstoppable decadence for the Ottoman Empire, and an inevitable destruction for the nation whose profile would be composed around them.

The nationalist concept of the “Arab”

This was precisely what the Anglo-French Orientalists, researchers and diplomats managed to carry out; they cultivated these socio-behavioural attributes that clearly belong to nomadic people of the pre-Islamic era. The most uneducated aspect of Arab Bedouin was therefore promoted to “expression of identity” for the Aramaeans of Damascus and Baghdad, the Phoenicians of Beirut and Lattakiyeh, the Egyptians of Alexandria, and the Berbers of Algiers. This was the epitome of the Anglo-French evildoing.

The formation of the nationalist concept of the “Arab” evolved around the following axes that had been elaborated by the Anglo-French Orientalists and diplomats:

1 –   Accentuated disregard for the pre-Islamic past of their native lands — for all populations targeted with the “Arab national identity projection” plan.

This occurred of course in striking contrast with the Anglo-French attitude toward “nations” that they planned to promote and help expand, such as Greeks, Serbs, Armenians, Persians, Abyssinians; among these “nations,” the Anglo-French Orientalists promoted an excessive interest for the falsified past, a real archaeolatry, and diffused falsified versions of History that intentionally and distortedly over-magnify the said nations’ past.

Indicatively, suffice it to state here that the disregard of the Egyptian past, which was triggered in Egypt by the Angklo-French, had as result that for more than 100 years after Champollion deciphered Egyptian Hieroglyphics, there was not a single Egyptian scholar able to read Classical Egyptian.

2 –   Advanced dissociation from their native but forgotten tongue (Aramaean, Mahrani, Socotri, Kushitic, Coptic, Berber — as per the respective geographic area); to this measure were later added the “needed” arabization campaigns that prove by themselves that the targeted populations were not Arab of origin.

3 –   Weak and discredited educational system

4 –   Indifference for reading, wide culture, encyclopedic education, cultural activities, intellectual life, personal improvement

5 –   Servile admiration of the technological achievements of the Western world

6 –   Slavish attitude toward the colonial diplomats, military and academics, combined with a parallel but disproportionate egoism and arrogance toward indigenous people of lower classes

7 –   Absolute lack of civic sense

8 –   Absence of any familiarity with (daily) life in urban centers

9 –   Indifference for the ?outer world’ which means inability to demonstrate interest for anything beyond the narrow circle of life (the community in which every ?Arab’ lives). Here I have to stress that I mainly refer to the formation period which is the 19th century; inability to cope with movements like that of Kemal Ataturk in Turkey underscored this attitude among ?Syrians’, ?Iraqis’, ?Palestinians’, Arabs, Yemenites and Egyptians during the period 1920 – 1940. The statement may look exaggerated if referring to our global world, but it is still very valid. Who considers possible in today’s Saudi Arabia for a university to offer courses on Pre-Columbian Mexico, Assyrian — Babylonian Cuneiform or Manichaean texts from Central Asia?

10 –   Creation of a divide among the local populations’ mindset and attitude: those, who admire and are attracted by the Western lifestyle, mindset and attitude, fail to understand the underlying concepts and principles whereas those, who oppose them, fail to perceive (let alone express) their rejection in terms of concepts, principles and values.

Certainly, the Anglo-French Orientalists and diplomats did not generate this lack of concepts, principles and values in the minds of their victims; these had already been transformed into mere rules during the long period of diffusion of Ibn Taimiya’s system and disintegration of the Islamic Civilization. But the emergence of a socio-behavioural system whereby the subjects of a country act on the basis of rules and prescriptions (and not concepts, principles and critical thinking) is greatly beneficial to those attempting to manipulate that society, as it eliminates unpredictable developments, and thus facilitates the overall game.

11 –   Exploitation of the aforementioned divide and the ensued clash between those attracted by the Western lifestyle, mindset and attitude and those opposing them.

A.   The former, due to their attitude (as per above), never reached the level of proper evaluation and real understanding of the Western lifestyle and mindset; as they constituted a small social minority, they relied on Western support totally, and because of this, they never put conditions for their readiness to betray their country in order to further ensure the “privileges” that they had due to their cooperation with the Anglo-French Orientalists, diplomats, and businessmen. They thus failed to ever understand the functionality of the Western lifestyle and truly make it work for themselves — the only exception in this regard was Kemal Ataturk. And this made the great difference between Turkey and the miserable pseudo-Arab states for so many decades.

The Western attitude toward the 19th century Ottoman citizens who were attracted by the Western lifestyle and mindset demonstrates that the colonial powers did not want to “correct” the Islamic world and merely make their model common to all but simply intended to infiltrate and destroy, spread chaos and conflicts.

In fact, in not a single part of the colonized Ottoman Empire (between 1798 and 1918) can one detect an effort deployed by the Anglo-French Orientalists, diplomats, and businessmen in order to truly educate the pro-Western elements of the local societies and make of them integral and genuine Western individuals. The Anglo-French interest villainously and perversely evolved around the two axes:

•   exploitation of the natural resources and

•   destruction of the Ottoman Empire.

That’s why the historical role for the pro-Western elements proved to be calamitous and ominous.

B. The latter, due to their attitude (as per above), never formulated their opposition to the Western lifestyle, on the basis of a pertinent perception and proper evaluation of the Western lifestyle and mindset. Their rejection was not a properly speaking theoretical reaction, based on comparisons between different concepts and principles; it was merely an instinctive reaction that helped only reassert the main elements of their socio-behavioural system, stress their characteristics, and consolidate their barbarism. The phenomenon was repeated very often, and it thus had a disastrous impact on them over the span of two centuries.

As they constituted the majority, they represented the epicenter of the Anglo-French Freemasonic colonial policy making; although deprived of power (which would allow them express their reaction in a disastrous manner mainly for them), they would basically be allowed to shape the developments — according to the wishes of the Anglo-French colonial elites.

The importance of the majority of the depersonalized, ignorant and misguided populations of the Ottoman provinces for the Anglo-French Freemasonic colonial policy making consisted mainly in the need of the colonial powers to avert the true search for identity, conceptual approach to facts and developments, and in general, everything that would make of them a force of Ottoman (and Islamic) renaissance.

Finally, the model of the fabricated “Arab” was ready at around the end of the 19th century. The Anglo-French Orientalists realized that they would consolidate it with a dose of Islamism, which not only would be totally unrelated to the Golden Era of Islam but also form a further step in the degeneration of Islam.

It goes without saying that the situation of the Islamic faith and society further deteriorated during the 19th century because of its own downward dynamics. The rise of the Wahhabism, the absurd barbarism of Abdelwahhab, a heretic Arab of the Nejd desert, was widely accepted among the disoriented masses of the Arabic speaking Aramaeans of Palestine, Syria, Mesopotamia and the southern coastlands of the Persian Gulf. The Anglo-French colonial agents and diplomats did everything they could to help diffuse both, Wahhabism itself and several of its constituent elements among the non Wahhabi populations of Egypt, Atlas and India.

The addition of selected elements taken from the degenerated ?Islamisms’ of Jamal al-din al Afghani (1838 — 1897; Freemason and teacher of the next mentioned), Muhammad Abdu (1849 — 1905; the Freemason Mufti of Egypt!), Hassan al Banna (1906 — 1949, a declared Hanbali of Egypt) and Sayyid Qutb (1906 — 1966) onto the final portrait of the “Arab” helped the Anglo-French Freemasonic Orientalists deliver an extremely inconsistent model that undoubtedly destroys every people on whom it may be projected. With the materialization of this policy and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the path was open for the fake but explosive “Middle East” to be incepted. When Michel Aflaq (1910 — 1989; another Freemason), an Ottoman Christian citizen of Aramaean descent who belonged to the Greek Antiochian Orthodox rite, studied in Paris in the 1930s, the fake tableau of the Middle East was available and ready to accommodate additional pseudo-theories (like Ba’athism). Furthermore, the “Arab” pseudo-states were about to be proclaimed in order to exclusively serve the nefarious interests of the Anglo-French Freemasonry.

Fake State of Israel and Pseudo-Arab States: the Two Faces of the Same Coin

Following the end of WW II, the colonial establishments of France and England set in motion the next major operation, namely the formation of a great number of pseudo-Arab states that were geared to clash with the equally fake state of Israel.

Due to the overwhelming propagation of the Pan-Arabist fallacy, very few people are now able to understand that the fake state of Israel simply could not exist without the parallel existence of the fake “Arab” states.

The reason for which the fake state of Israel expanded in 1948 and 1967 has a name: “Arabs,” i.e. a fake nation composed out of numerous states and ignorant and besotted populations – victims that fail to imagine their true identity, understand the historical realities, and achieve an accurate perception of the current situation. Only “Arab” pseudo-states, administered by blinded, ignorant, idiotic and barbaric magistrates, can fail to identify the plausible solutions that can apply in the case of the fake state of Israel.

The extensive demonization of the “Arabs,” the fallacious identification of Islam with the non existent “Arabs,” the identification of the “Arab” and the (associated) “Muslim” with an unknown but barbaric “Other” and the irritation of the Western and global audiences with vilifying narratives about appalling practices and lifestyles that typify the “villainous other” are all methods of justification of the illegal presence of the non Israelite, and definitely anti-Jewish, Zionist state of fake Israel.

But if the “Arabs” had not been fabricated, all these methods would not have been carried out, and the absurd existence of the all-threatening and none-protecting pseudo-state Israel would not have been justifiable to anybody.

In fact, if a diverse reality of Berbers, Egyptian Copts, Kushites, Yemenites, and Aramaeans, along with the Hedjaz (real) Arabs existed in the wider area between the Atlantic Ocean, the Indian Ocean and Central Asia, who would prepare the comical and fake maps of a huge threatening Arab League territory with the adjacent minimal portion of the fake state of Israel which becomes thus “justifiable”?

Who could ever attempt to vilify the Phoenicians and portray the Aramaeans as perilous?

How could Egypt be denigrated if Muslims and Christians spoke Coptic?

What possibly negative impression could have a Berber Algeria ever made to people in Europe and America?

Who among the Western nations would not love Sudan if Africa’s largest country were named Ethiopia and included in its modified territory the Oromos who are the Kushitic brethren of today’s Arabic-speaking Sudanese?

And is it not evident that Yemen, divided into Sheba (North) and Hadhramawt (South), would radiate in peace?

Who prevented this peaceful and human situation from coming to existence?

Who disseminated discord and pestilence throughout the united and peaceful Ottoman territory?

Who propagated among the Western nations the ceaselessly repeated arabization plans that have been undertaken by the dictators of all the pseudo-Arab countries?

Le Monde, Le Figaro, Times, Newsweek, Washington Post, Frankfurter Allgemeine, Economist, New York Times, Time, Los Angeles Times, L’ Orient Le Jour, Daily Telegraph — and all the other Freemasonic mass media that supported the Zionist fabrication pseudo-Israel.

Their fake “Arab” is an inexistent nation born to be the scapegoat of all defamation campaigns, the tool of extermination for so many countries and peoples absorbed within the fake “Arab” melting pot and the fallacious “Israeli” — “Arab” maelstrom.

The arabization projects for the Berbers, the Tuareg, the Copts, the Aramaeans, the Yemenites, the Omanis, the Nubians and the Kushites are the antipodes of the Jewish Holocaust, an unspeakable multi-genocide carried out against more than 230 million people.

In Syria, the arabization project took also the form of persecution of the Aramaic language and eradication of the Aramaean Heritage. Last deplorable measure was the shutting down of the Aramaic Institute in Damascus. I republish herewith an insightful published in the leading Aramaean portal Aram Nahrin, I will further expand in several forthcoming articles.

Shutting down of Aramaic institute: It would be a travesty for Syria

On 2nd of April 2010 an article was published by the Christian Science Monitor entitled “Easter Sunday: A Syrian bid to resurrect Aramaic, the language of Jesus Christ” (see below) on the closing of the Aramaic institute initiated in 2007 at the university of Damascus.

The reasons seem to be the deep-seated hatred and paranoia towards Israel. A newspaper in Syria published an article saying that the used square Aramaic characters resemble the Hebrew alphabet used now in Israel. Because the hatred towards everything which is ?Jews’ or ?Israel’ seem so huge, that the university of Damascus decided to freeze the course for the time being. This is a monumental insanity that goes beyond any imagination!

Most probably this horrendous blind hatred towards Israel will at the end lead not only Syria, but also other Islamic “Arabic” countries to fire and destruction. And probably it is this insanity and blind hatred that finally will lead to the prophecy of Isaiah 17:1-3 to be carried out, “The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from [being] a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap. 2 The cities of Aroer [are] forsaken: they shall be for flocks, which shall lie down, and none shall make [them] afraid.

Historians tell that Damascus is the only city which continuously has been inhabited during its existence. In the prophecy of Isaiah we are told about the total annihilation of Damascus resulting in ruinous heap which never will be inhabited. There has been suggested that when a war will start in the Middle-East between Israel and it’s mainly Islamic “Arabic” neighbours (prophecy Psalms 83), Damascus probably will be completely annihilated by nuclear bomb or Scalar weaponry (Amongst those who posses the scalar weaponry are Israel, Russia, China and few other countries. The US posses the less advanced HAARP system).

In the article of Christian Science Monitor David Taylor is being quoted. On the closing of the Aramaic institute he says, “It would also be a travesty for Syria”. Worse, it would be a monumental travesty.

More than 1,5 million Arameans in Syria

Syria is one of the less countries where the Arameans relatively enjoy freedom. Although the Aramean cultural heritage is being oppressed (many of them being assimilated and “Arabised”), yet on the religious level the various Aramean denominations in Syria are able to exercise their faith in freedom in contradiction to for example the situation of the Copts in Egypt who suffer terrible under fanaticism and barbarism (see also our letter to the president of Syria, Bashar Assad on 6-7-2009)

Hafes Assad (president 1971-2000), the father of present president of Syria, Bashar Assad, ruled Syria with discipline and tight hand. Fanaticism, like for example in Egypt, was not tolerated and suppressed mercilessly. The same method of combating fanaticism and intolerance was also applied in Iraq by Saddam Hussein. The power of the both rulers, Saddam and Hafes, was based on the secular Ba’at party, something which opened the way for the Aramean Christians to climb on the political ladder. An example was the East- Aramean Chaldean minister of Iraq Tarreq Aziz.

The various Aramean denominations in Syria always enjoyed certain degree of freedom of religion. To build and to restore of churches, schools and other buildings in Syria is very normal in contrast to some other Islamic countries where even building a wall is forbidden.

There are in Syria more than 1,5 million Arameans of various denominations, namely: Syrian Orthodox, Syrian Catholic, Syrian Melkite Catholic, Syrian Melkite orthodox, Nestorian Chaldeans, Nestorian Assyrians and Syrian Maronites.

In the West Syria is heavily being criticized and have been put on black list of “rogue” states. The same qualifications was attributed to Iraq of Saddam Hussein. The West would bring so-called “civilization,” ?democracy” and “respect for human rights” to Iraq. Result: bloodbaths, uranium poison, more than million Iraqis killed, malformed children, thousands orphans and widows, million homeless, broken families, destroyed churches, homes and other buildings.

The vast majority of the Iraqi people is looking with outrage and condemnation to the “liberation” and “bringing democracy and human rights” to Iraq by the West. The sympathy for the Iraqi journalist who threw a shoe to George Bush during his visit to Iraq, is a vivid proof for the condemnation of the Iraqi people for what in the name of “freedom” and “democracy” has been done to their country. Obviously, the Aramean Christians are not interested to bring similar “democracy” and “human rights” by the West to Syria. Under regime of Saddam Hussein, the Aramean Christians enjoyed respect, honor and occupied high positions in the politics, the army and flourished economically very well. After “civilization,” “human rights” and “democracy” was brought to Iraq by the West, the majority of the Aramean people left Iraq, have lost their social, political positions, are marginalized and are a easy prey for fanatical groups and ordinary criminals. Of course nobody is interested in this kind of “democracy” and “human rights”.

Easter Sunday: A Syrian bid to resurrect Aramaic, the language of Jesus Christ

April 2, 2010

Jesus Christ is remembered on Good Friday and Easter Sunday, but the language he spoke is all but forgotten. A controversial new language institute in Syria seeks to save Aramaic.

Malula, Syria

While millions will commemorate the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ this Easter Sunday, only a handful of people could discuss his works in the language of his day: Aramaic.

Nearly all of them live in three Syrian villages, the last outposts in a region largely swept by the Arabic of Islam. In a bid to preserve its ancient heritage, Syria launched a series of language courses in 2007 to bolster the fading influence of a 3,000-year-old language that once reigned supreme in the Middle East.

And so it was that an Aramaic institute joined the cluster of buildings that cling to a rocky spine in the village of Malula, about 35 miles northwest of Damascus. But the program ran into trouble recently, when a Syrian newspaper suggested that the alphabet being used to teach written Aramaic bore an uncanny resemblance to the Hebrew characters found in modern-day Israel.

Worried that a flagship heritage scheme might in any way be associated with the country’s neighboring enemy, the government-run University of Damascus, which established the institute, acted quickly to freeze the Aramaic program.

“There were some people in the press trying to cause trouble,” says George Rezkallah, an elderly villager from Malula who runs the institute. He is hopeful that classes will be able to resume this summer.

The origins of Aramaic

Speaking from his flat overlooking the village’s higgledy-piggledy hillside houses, Mr. Rezkallah says that while the two alphabets do have similarities, it is Aramaic which first began using square lettering around the 12th century BC.

The Hebrew now used in Israel, he said, was formulated 700 years later after the restoration of the ancient kingdom of the Jews in the 5th century BC.
“The Persians adopted Aramaic. The Babylonians adopted it and so did the Jews. It then prevailed as the language of the Middle East until 700 AD.”

David Taylor, author of “The Hidden Pearl: Aramaic Heritage of the Syrian Orthodox Church,” adds that the Jewish people adopted the square Aramaic alphabet — which had become the lingua franca of the entire Middle East from about 700 BC — after they were exiled to Babylon in 587 BC, before which they had used a Palaeo-Hebrew script.

The fact that it has survived in Malula today is nothing short of a “miracle,” says Gene Gragg, professor of Near Eastern Languages at the University of Chicago.

“It would be something of a linguistic tragedy if this splendid survivor were allowed to disappear,” he added.

It would also be a travesty for Syria, says Dr. Taylor.

“Aramaic is a constant reminder of the international importance of Syria in the ancient world, when it was a beacon of learning and culture that had a profound impact worldwide,” he says. “It mirrors the cultural, linguistic and religious diversity that has always been of such great importance in Syria and is key to its long-term success.”

A last remnant of Jesus’s language

Modern branches of the language are still spoken across southeast Turkey, northern Iraq, and northwest Iran.

But the dialect spoken by its inhabitants — as well as the residents of two nearby, mostly Muslim, villages — is the only survivor of Western Aramaic, the closest modern descendant to the language spoken by Jesus and his disciples.

It would, in all probability, have been spoken by the Christian martyr St. Thecla, a disciple of St. Paul whose tomb in Malula draws pilgrims from around the world.

“It’s quite extraordinary,” says Annyck Wustyn, a 63-year-old visitor from France. “In our country, where we are mostly Catholic, Aramaic is like a myth. Now I know it is a reality.”

Pushing forward with the program

Undeterred by the move to shut down his Aramaic institute, Rezkallah plans to introduce a new course this summer which, for the first time, will include a textbook using Aramaic to English translations — effectively opening up the institute to non-Arabic speaking students for the first time since it was founded.

According to Rezkallah, the dispute over the Hebrew similarities is still “being discussed,” but the institute has trained an extra nine teachers this year in anticipation of an extension of the program. The new textbook will, however, use Syriac script from the second century BC in lieu of square Aramaic lettering.

For the likes of Atallah Shaib, a young man working in his father’s restaurant overlooking the rickety houses of Malula, the fight to secure his language’s future is as important as ever.

“Aramaic is not a normal language,” says Mr. Shaib, his rolled-up sleeves revealing a series of inky blue Aramaic tattoos on his forearms. “It’s Jesus Christ’s language, and that’s the most important reason why we should keep it alive.”

Note — Picture: Muhammad Ali and Freemasonic diplomats in Alexandria ruling a “country” that was not theirs and against the will of the indigenous populations who all wanted to be part of the Ottoman Empire. Painting by David Roberts

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

   By: Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
   [ Enlarge ]
What happens these days in today’s world demonstrates very well that Muslims and Christians have been caught victims of an unnecessary and malicious plan.

At the other end, Christians in Europe and America have been misled — through an incessant brainwash orchestrated by their mass media, politicians and intellectuals — and believe that the average Muslim has been radicalized, and is now ready for a Jihad against Christianity and the West.

This is all wrong. In fact, it is a false debate where both clashing parts have a distorted perception of the “other”, and of themselves. What is at stake involves both religions, all the religions of the world, and the world peace.

What Muslims failed to understand: the West is not Christian.

Muslims seem to forget that the Western countries are not Christian countries; they are merely countries with Christian populations, but the principles and the ideas of Christianity have been systematically disrespected and marginalized there. These countries were Christian indeed in the past, but confusing 15th century Europe with today’s Anti-Christian Europe is sheer proof of ignorance.

The Muslims confuse Medieval, Christian Europe’s Anti-Islamic stance with today’s Europe’s Anti-Islamic delirium. Terrible mistake with calamitous consequences!

Never ever has a Modern Muslim undertaken a critical examination of Europe’ identity; even worse, not a single Muslim today imagines as possible for him to undertake a research based let’s say on Ibn Khaldoun’s systematic investigative approach. Muslim historians have been accustomed with Western analytical methods in their explorations and investigations, thus enslaving themselves to a system that is not theirs, and to conclusions that are genuinely wrong for a Muslim to draw.

Simple observation and criticism would however be enough for a Muslim to understand that all the Christian values, principles and concepts on which the Christian Western societies were based have totally disappeared. These values, principles and concepts may perhaps be shared by many average people in the West, but they ceased to be the axis around which evolve the Western societies, their administrations and policy-making.

In fact, the values, principles and concepts that form the essence of today’s Western ruling class mindset, policy making and Weltanschauung are at the very antipodes of Christianity. Materialism, consumerism, immoral behaviour, corruption, relativism, nihilism, conformism, conventionalism, formalism, evolutionism and individualism prevail along with a foolish inclination for technological innovation, luxurious leisure, debauchery, incommensurable selfishness and overwhelming hypocrisy.

The driving force that eliminated Christianity brought forth the aforementioned, purely Anti-Christian situation. All this is due to the subversive tactics of Free Masonry, an ages-old society that in the process of its opposition to Vatican and to the official Christianity was transformed from inside and turned to an apostate guild. The subversive tactics undertaken by the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge in its search for prevalence condemned it to apostasy. Without deeply understanding these developments, no one can understand the evolution of the Western societies, and the phenomena of colonization (as practiced mainly by France and England) and globalization (as practiced mainly by America).

This subversion makes it possible that even in an institution that has been traditionally opposed to Freemasonry, like Vatican, one can possibly find members of the organization — and at times its head — who are Freemasons and act subversively in order to control and guide at will the organization in question.

This is precisely what happens with Vatican today; the present pope has been repeatedly accused by important Christian organizations as being a Freemason, which is absolutely incompatible with the quality of a Christian, and of a Muslim as well (http://www.virgo-maria.org/#). This imposes differentiation policies, and if they are not introduced, Muslims will simply fail in their approach to Europe, America and the Western world.

What Christians failed to understand: the East is not Islamic.

Similarly, Christians seem to forget that the Eastern countries are not Islamic / Muslim countries; they are countries with Muslim populations but the principles and the ideas of Islam have been systematically disrespected and marginalized at the level of the ruling elites, their mindset, lifestyle, behavioural system, administrative choices and policies, and more particularly their foreign policy making. These countries were Muslim indeed, but confusing 16th century Ottoman Empire with today’s pseudo-Muslim states is sheer proof of ignorance.

The Christians confuse Islamic Ages’ Islamic expansion at the detriment of Christianity with today’s Islamic World’s Anti-Western rhetoric. Terrible mistake with calamitous consequences!

Even worse, few Christians realize in the West that the same forces that demolished systematically the Christian values for the past three centuries, principles and concepts are those who shaped and imposed an interpretative method of the Oriental civilizations (Islamic included), which was adjusted to their sociopolitical, economic and global interests, and therefore is absolutely untrue.

Christians in the West failed to understand that one of the nefarious counterparts of Darwinism and evolutionism was the Orientalist doctrine of Islamology, which was geared to both, prevent Westerners from knowing the true Islam and let Muslim scholars persist on their obsolete analyses and approaches that further drag them to irrevocable ignorance and permanent impotence.

Christians in the West failed to understand that the inventors of the fallacious term “Arab — Muslim civilization” (civilisation arabo-musulmane) are identical with the promoters of the gay marriages in the West; even worse, real Catholic and Orthodox Christians failed to overtly accuse of apostasy the pseudo-Christian Evangelical puppets of the Freemasons who are those who promote both, the Zionisation of Christianity and the Anti-Islamic hysteria that deepens the unnecessary chasm between Christians and Muslims.

Even worse, never ever has a Modern Christian undertaken a critical examination of the Islamic World’s identity, other than the Islamological Orientalist fallacy of the Freemasons; even worse, not a single Christian today imagines as possible for him to undertake a research based on let’s say Theophanes’, George Syncellus’, Michel Psellos’ or John Damascenus’ theoretical approaches. Christian Western historians have been accustomed to use Freemasonic Orientalist analytical methods in their explorations and investigations, thus enslaving themselves to a system that is not theirs, and to conclusions that are genuinely wrong for a Christian to draw.

Simple observation and criticism would however be enough for a Christian to understand that all the Islamic values, principles and concepts on which the Islamic societies were traditionally based have by now disappeared. These values, principles and concepts may perhaps be shared by average people in many Muslim countries, but they ceased to be the axis around which the Muslim societies, their administrations and policy-making evolve.

In fact, the values, principles and concepts that form the essence of the Modern Muslim ruling classes mindset, policy making and Weltanschauung are at the very antipodes of genuine, traditional Islam. Filthy liars and bogus sheikhs ready to justify anything are therefore hired in the Islamic World’s leading mosques and universities in order to serve their criminal and pseudo-Islamic presidents, tyrants, emirs and bogus-kings, and they lecture the besotted masses that one Muslim can play football, spend his holidays in 5 stars hotels, organize Marketing campaigns for Coca Cola and Mc Donald’s, and go shopping in the malls.

Islam is thus reduced to a meaningless pseudo-prayer and the besotted pseudo-Muslim masses are told that this is enough to ensure good judgment in the Hereafter. At the same time, due to the advanced Westernization of the pseudo-Muslim societies, materialism, consumerism, immoral behaviour, corruption, relativism, nihilism, conformism, conventionalism, formalism, evolutionism and individualism prevail among pseudo-Muslims along with a foolish inclination for technological innovation, luxurious leisure, debauchery, incommensurable selfishness and overwhelming hypocrisy.

In fact, Islam had fallen into desuetude and coma before Napoleon arrived in Egypt, and even before the English set foot in India. The decadence was due to the rise in force of several negative and nefarious elements and doctrines that at first had been rejected and castigated; however, quite unfortunately, these doctrines managed to survive, expand and even give birth to lower and more degraded doctrinal systems. From Ahmed Ibn Hanbal to Ibn Taimiya and thence to Abdel Wahhab, a grave deterioration of thought, intellect, mental and intellectual processes, and a dramatic degradation and elimination of wisdom, knowledge, art, research and behaviour turned the Islamic civilization into a filthy realm of fanaticism, ignorance, hatred, negativism, and barbarism. This became the realm where tolerance is customarily shown for every attempt of lowering, vulgarizing and bestializing the human being. When Napoleon arrived in Egypt, the Islamic civilization — as assimilated, assessed, expanded and elevated by Masters of the World Thought like Tabari, Khwarismi, Ferdowsi, Ibn Sina, Qurtubi, Mohyieldin Ibn Arabi, Ibn Hazm, Ibn Rushd and many others — simply did not exist anymore.

The early Orientalists, who were all European Freemasons and, under the pretext of search and exploration, did their best to offer false interpretations of the historical phenomena (not only those pertaining to the Islamic Ages), noticed the aforementioned disastrous fall of the Islamic world, and to capitalize on their early colonial success, they triggered among the Muslim societies a series of socioeconomic, political and intellectual, pre-calculated reactions that pushed the colonized Muslim societies further deeper in the bottom. Through this, the Freemasonic Orientalist academia of England and France managed to control and exploit the Muslim societies in a way that made them stronger back home.

Robbing Muslims’ Wealth to Destroy Christianity: Typically Freemasonic

This is the truth that obliges today Christians and Muslims to merge against their common enemy: the wealth extracted from occupied Muslim lands was indeed used by the Freemasonic socioeconomic and political establishment of the West in order to finance the destruction of Christianity in the West.

The driving force that perpetuated Islam’s putrefaction is identical with those who destroyed the Christian identity of the West, and plunged the Western societies into endless crimes, such as abortion, homosexual marriages, and generalized corruption. The same subversive tactics applied by the criminal Freemasonic establishment in the Islamic World damaged the Christians in the West, although the colonial powers’ victories in Africa, the Middle East, the Balkans and South Asia were effectively depicted as a success for the entire Christianity.

But what sort of Pyrrhic victory is it for the true Christians of the West the fact of an African becoming Christian, if this person’s children, living in America, carry out a totally Anti-Christian life full of materialism, sexualism, amoral behaviour, consumerism, and oblivion of all faiths?

As a matter of fact, the Ottoman Oil stolen by France, England and the US through the illegal occupation of the Ottoman territories (Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Emirates and Oman) was not “good” for the Christians in the West. It merely helped elect Freemasonic popes in the 50s, the 60s, the 70s, and the 2000s.

That is why Christian organizations should form a great platform with Muslims who are able to carry out self-criticism and understand that today’s Muslim fanatics trying to radicalize the Muslim societies and escalate the Christian — Muslim clash are merely playing into the Freemasonic game of Islam’s ultimate disaster and annihilation.

Note — Picture: “Cardinal” O’Connor (an intimate friend of anti-pope John Paul 2) Pictured Smiling with Two Full Aproned Freemasons. From: http://www.todayscatholicworld.com/nov05tcw.htm

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

BBC: Close your eyes and try to imagine the scenes of jubilation across Africa if a team from the continent were to win the 2010 World Cup.

A celebration like no other, one billion people reveling in one of the greatest sporting and cultural achievements.

For the first time in its 80-year history, football’s blue riband competition is coming to the world’s poorest and most underdeveloped land.

How better to mark the occasion than with a first African champion?

“Winning the World Cup would be one of the proudest moments in the history of that country and our continent as a whole,” former South Africa striker Shaun Bartlett told BBC Sport.

“Every African nation has its internal problems but football can do wonders for people and nations, which is a huge incentive.”

Nobody is saying it is going to happen but the groundswell of opinion suggests South Africa 2010 is the best opportunity yet. [ READ MORE ]

The Genius of Pele

The 2010 Draw:

Group A: South Africa, Mexico, Uruguay, France

Group B: Argentina, Nigeria, Korea Republic, Greece

Group C: England, USA, Algeria, Slovenia

Group D: Germany, Australia, Serbia, Ghana

Group E: Netherlands, Denmark, Japan, Cameroon

Group F: Italy, Paraguay, New Zealand, Slovakia

Group G: Brazil, Korea DPR, Côte d’Ivoire, Portugal

Group H: Spain, Switzerland, Honduras, Chile

[ READ MORE ]

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

One of the most critical aspects of the Horn of Africa crisis concerns China. In fact, it has little to do with China’s merely quantitative presence in the African continent. The economic – technological presence and significance of China in Africa have already been noticed and commented, but this type of achievement, albeit important at the commercial level, has no political consequences, let alone global dimensions.

China must realize that its presence in Africa, although necessary for the country’s needs in terms of resources, exports, commercial partners, and economic penetration, has not yet reached the level of political influence, military involvement, and determinant geo-political impact.

It is essential for Beijing to understand, when it comes to China’s global presence and prevalence, that this critical affair has little to do with the volume of exports and imports and with a veto in the Security Council votes.

In Africa, China finds itself opposed to ca. 250 years of European colonialism which led to the formation of postcolonial regimes that – in order to be totally submitted to the interests, the plans, and the needs of England and France – are by nature totalitarian, racist, criminal, corrupt, and mostly inhuman.

The interaction of all these corrupt and totalitarian regimes of Africa is – in and by itself – another dimension of colonial involvement and perfidy. Below is an example:

1. England and France (plus the US, as a neophyte in the postcolonial era) are behind the support offered to the criminal state Abyssinia (that colonial English and French scholars explained to the idiotic and ignorant Amhara rulers why it should be renamed as ‘Ethiopia’ in order to contribute to the performance of 14 genocides against the subjugated Kushitic and Nilo-Saharan nations).

2. England and France (plus the US) are behind the destructive work perpetrated since 1991 against the Somali Nation that does not suit the colonial plans for Eastern Africa.

3. Last but not least, England and France (plus the US) are behind the Abyssinian invasion of part of the Somali territory (in December 2006) and behind the withdrawal of the defeated Abyssinian army.

How could China outmaneuver this complot?

Rejecting the false lenses made available by Western mass media of global disinformation is a first critical step to take. China must offer itself an accurate, holistic, balanced and fair perception of the developments throughout the African continent.

Otherwise, every evaluation will hinge on false data and prefabricated images that the perfidious, criminal powers of the Colonial West have done their ingenious best to overwhelmingly diffuse and successfully ensure that their potential challenges (China, India, Russia, Brazil, Japan, Germany, Italy, the Islamic World, African Liberation movements and fronts) never get the entire picture correctly.

China and Somalia in 1900 – Equally Targeted by Perfidious, Colonial England

Demonizing rivals and targets has always been a favorable method of the colonial powers; before 100 years, in the then targeted Somalia (1899 – 1905), Mohamed Abdullah Hassan had become just the “mad mullah“; he was not “mad” and his identity of mullah represents only a minor aspect of his great personality of intellectual, mystic, Islamic theoretician, social transformer and political leader and liberator.

Chinese can understand very well why the great visionary of the Somali Nation Mohamed Abdullah Hassan, honorably called As Sayid by all the Somalis, became a “mad mullah” for the criminal colonial gangsters of England.

Because he opposed the use of khat chewing which was greatly promoted and diffused by the English in order to engulf the local populations to social decay, political decadence, religious digression, and national decomposition.

China was equally targeted by the monstrous, inhuman and criminal gangsters, the English and the French, at those days. To colonize the Chinese, the perfidious colonial powers devised several methods one of which was the diffusion, throughout China, of opium produced in occupied India. China was constrained to defend its national integrity in successive Opium wars (1839 – 42, 1856 – 60); the evil English practice triggered the overwhelming reaction of the Chinese people as evidenced in events such as the Taiping Revolution (1850 – 64) and the Boxer Revolution (1899 – 1901).

To help Somali readership be better acquainted with the English Anti-Chinese hysteria and felony, I merely state here that the aforementioned glorious event is only conventionally called “Boxer Revolution.” In fact, the Boxers were called by themselves after the noble association that they had established, namely “Boxer Revolution” (Yihe tuan). Boxers is a pejorative term that could not have been devised but by a monstrous and criminal elite of gangsters like that of England.

Mohamed Abdullah Hassan: “Mad Mullah” or the Somali Boxer?

For both, Chinese and Somalis, to learn better the common identity of their righteous cause, I can merely say that Mohamed Abdullah Hassan (the ‘mad mullah‘ of the English colonial gangsters) was a …. Somali Boxer.

And the splendid ideals, the humanist goals, the peaceful mind, and the noble vision of the Righteous Harmony Society Movement in China were absolutely identical with those of the Saalihiya Order which was diffused among the Somalis by Mohamed Abdullah Hassan.

Mohamed Abdullah Hassan was criminally labeled “mad” by the English because he did not accept that evil and hypocritical “missionaries”, under the pretext of “help” offered to Somali orphans at Daymoole, should be allowed to attempt to diffuse – in a most immoral, shameful and camouflaged way – their Christian faith.

In the same way, the Boxers’ rightful denunciation of the disastrous work made in China by Western missionaries was labeled by the English as ‘Anti-Christian’.

For the viciously Anti-Christian, Freemasonic regime of England, which caused the greatest possible damages to Catholic Christianity (notably through their Anglican heresy), it is just ludicrous to introduce pejorative terms for other nations, parties and persons who happened to have attempted what the English did try for themselves in the first place, namely to stay apart of foreign control, foreign faith, and external influence.

This is the natural evilness of the English historiographers, intellectuals, diplomats and journalists:

If the “mad” mullah had accepted the duplicitous, concealed and criminal effort of the “missionaries” to Christianize Somalia, he would not be ….. “mad.”

Today, this “logic” threatens Somalia, China, and the entire world. It is the same inhuman attitude displayed before 100 years in both, China and Somalia; to speak frankly, it is the paranoia of the rapist who tries to appear as possibly innocent and credibly righteous.

What about today’s English regime of Inhuman Freemasonry?

Will they accept the Somali sheikhs Hassan Dahir Aweys, Hassan Turki, and Mukhtar Robow to …. leave Somalia for a while, move to England, visit the poor, unemployed and needy English, and proselytize them to Islam “that would solve all their problems”?

Just like the “missionaries” at Daymoole, Somalia, who made the local orphans say in 1897 that “they belonged to the clan of the (Christian) Fathers”, today’s impoverished English may wish to belong to the Nation of the Muslims. What about a scenario like this?

The use of the pejorative adjectives was never a matter of sparing concern among the English and the French colonials and within the circle of the world mass media that they have been customarily bribed and unreservedly corrupted.

It is certainly more convenient for them now to avoid the term “mad” and put all the stakes on adjectives and nouns like the following: “hard line”, “fanatic”, “radical”, “extremist” and “terrorist.”

China Cannot Afford Anymore the Fallacious Western Interpretations of Events

Simply, this situation cannot be afforded anymore by China. Because all the Somali “hard liners”, “fanatics”, “radicals”, “extremists” and “terrorists”, namely the sheikhs Hassan Dahir Aweys, Hassan Turki, and Mukhtar Robow, are today’s Somalia’s Righteous Harmony Society Movement.

Today’s Somalia’s Boxers Movement provides for peace, concord, serenity, national integrity, cultural authenticity, resolute commitment to Somalia’s re-edification and rehabilitation. To the full consternation of the English, French, and American colonials.

To focus on some isolated cases of literal implementation of Sharia Law in Kismayu and elsewhere is certainly purposeless.

These people suffered tremendously at the times of the Abyssinian occupation for which the evil colonial regimes of London and Washington are fully responsible.

These people saw the criminal gangster Jendayi Frazer shamelessly consider the Ogaden 2007 Genocide as an internal affair of the monstrous racist regime of Abysssinia; you cannot expect them to react like Confucius or some Greek Stoic philosophers. They view the excesses of their jurisdiction as the much needed underscoring of their opposition to the evil deeds of the Anti-Somali colonials; this is a sentimental stance, not a political approach. It will not continue for long after the so loathed AMISOM soldiers go, and the perspective of free constitutional elections comes closer.

China has many reasons – beyond a definite historical solidarity – to stretch a hand to the Somali Opposition, establish a contact with them, and thus acquire a firm basis in Eastern Africa. This I will extensively analyze in a forthcoming article.

Note: China Boxer Rebellion Mocking Card. Scarce Litho-postcard from the time of the Boxer Upraise in China, 1900. Mocking postcard depicting western soldiers, quarrelling. A Chinese smiling. Used as postcard in 1900. Faults at upper margin. Scarce. From: http://collect.at/wordpress/?p=1509

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Aramaeans have been for millennia the moving force of vast empires, like the Achaemenidian Persian, the Arsacid Parthian, and the Sassanid Iranian empires, as well as the Islamic Caliphates, particularly the Abbassid empire of Baghdad. Great Central Asiatic empires like the Kushan and the Uighur empires owe their strength and socio-economic interconnectedness to the use of Aramaic writing and language that helped diffuse many, different backgrounds’ religions, notably Mithraism, Manichaeism, other Gnosticisms, Buddhism, and Nestorian Christianism.

Due to their extensive islamization, the Aramaeans — in great numbers — lost their language and identity, as the majority among them adopted exclusively Arabic language after their islamization. Even worse, over the past five (5) centuries, the depopulated Christian Aramaeans, as the bulk of the Aramaean Nation (since few Aramaean Gnosticists, only the Mandaeans, have survived down to our days), have been targeted by the colonial West, France and England, and more recently the pro-European part of the American establishment.

The result is that the outright majority of the Mesopotamian Aramaeans fled away during the last two decades of the Ottoman Empire and the posterior period of rise of the colonial structures of Iraq and Syria that were systematically directed by the criminal colonial powers and their local puppets, the besotted agents of Pan-Arabism and Islamism, against the Aramaean Christianity. The recent deterioration of the situation of the Aramaeans of Iraq reflects only one stage of the Aramaean Genocide which has been carried out at two distinct levels, physical and spiritual.

Sending a dramatic Letter — Appeal to the President-elect Barack Obama, the chairmen of the three major Aramaean organizations, notably Gabriel Sengo, Chairman of the Arameans of Aram-Naharaim Organization, Gabi Gallo, Chairman of the Aramaic Democratic Organization, and Aboud Gouriye, Chairman of Platform Aram, highlight in a summarized form the troubles of the multi-targeted Christian Aramaeans of the Middle East.

I republish herewith the Letter — Appeal, as it emanates from those who should the primary concern for President-elect Barack Obama.

Aramean Organisations Sent a Letter to President-elect Barack Obama: Help the Persecuted Aramean People of the Middle-East, Focusing on Iraq

Nr.: 2008-11-26/6
Netherlands, 26th of November 2008
Subject: Re: Your overwhelming election as 44th president of the United States of America

The Most Honourable President-elect of the United States of America
His Excellency Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
United States

Dear Mr. President-elect,

We, the undersigned, the Arameans of Aram-Nahrin Organization, the Aramean Democratic Organization and Platform Aram want to congratulate you with your impressive and overwhelming election as the 44th president of United States of America.

We wish you much success and wisdom and we hope that under your leadership the United States of America will become a beacon of prosperity, stability, equality and justice for everyone.

Your Excellency, we would like to take this opportunity to draw your attention to the fragile situation of the Indigenous Aramean people of Mesopotamia, in ancient times called Aram-Nahrin in Aramaic and Aram-Naharaim in Hebrew.

The Aramean people (not to be confused with ‘Armenians’) have been present for thousands of years in this part of the world, also known as the Cradle of Civilization. The Aramean people speak Aramaic, the language spoken by Abraham, Moses and Jesus, through which they have made a very important contribution to world civilizations. [1] This ancient Semitic people, now divided into several denominations and spread throughout the Middle East, amount to approximately 8 million people worldwide.

History testifies that the Aramean people are peaceful minded, living according to the ten commandments, showing respect, dignity and love to their neighbours and always respecting the law of the countries in which they reside. They show others the example of love and brotherhood. In contrast to other peoples they never resorted to the path of intolerance, fanaticism and violent uprising. On the contrary their motto has always been: loving and respecting your neighbour like yourself!

Unfortunately, the Aramean concept of peaceful cooperation based on equality and mutual understanding is not cheered by everybody in the complex and turbulent area of the Middle-East; which has been the scene of battles and conflicts for hundreds of years between various groups and peoples whose dictionary seems to lack words like peace, brotherhood and respect. Our terrible experience is that many of these groups seem rather to resort to the path of intolerance and fanaticism.

This very path of fanaticism and intolerance has been the cause of discrimination against our nation, exclusion, extortion, ethnic cleansing, genocides[2] and continuous persecutions for hundreds of years right up until today.

Our nation is facing difficulties in many areas of the Middle-East, however their situation in Iraq is most severe, in particular in the Mosul area where a mass exodus took place in late September; after killings and threats by the forces of intolerance and fanaticism. In several letters to the government of Iraq and the United Nations we have tried to ask for their attention for the dire situation of our people[2]. In spite of measures taken by the central government, the situation of the Aramean indigenous nation of the Middle-East remains very precarious in the Mosul area.

The marginalization, persecution and exclusion of our nation for hundred of years and their fragile situation in our days, where they are threatened with ethnic cleansing from the land of their forefathers, is not exclusively due to the forces of fanaticism and intolerance, but it has its roots in the spiritual colonial practices of the Western missionaries and diplomats in the 16th and 19th centuries whereby nationalism and fanaticism was brought to the Middle-East. [2] In addition to this, we believe that the genocide of 1915 [4] which claimed the lives of around 600.000 Arameans of different denominations, would have been less severe if the Arameans were united and were not stuck with the hatred that was implemented by the outsiders in the name of “assistance,” “education” and “faith.”

Your Excellency;

The motto of your election campaign was ‘change,’ a term heard and understood very well by people from all walks of life. This not only attracted the attention of young people, of those living on the fringes of society, and of those who have been marginalized and ignored, but this also gave hope to many throughout the world.

From our side, we hope that this change, under your leadership, not only will be implemented in the United States but will also have its effects on other peoples and nations, who are living in a very weak and fragile situations throughout the world, including the Aramean indigenous nation of Aram-Nahrin, also made known as “Assyrians” or Chaldeans in some media; who at this moment face terror and destruction in Iraq, in particular in the Mosul area.

We hope that the situation of many weak, excluded and ignored nations, including Arameans, throughout the world will became a part of the spearhead of US foreign policy in order to facilitate more justice, equality, peace and brotherhood for many all over the world.

We are looking forward to working with your administration and we would be honored to provide you, where needed, with genuine information regarding the Aramean Indigenous Nation of Aram-Nahrin who has been continuously present for thousands of years in this part of the world. Again we want to underscore our best wishes to achieve the noble goals you have so clearly expressed during the election campaign.

Respectfully Yours,

Gabriel Sengo
Chairman
Arameans of Aram-Naharaim Organization

Gabi Gallo
Chairman
Aramaic Democratic Organization

Aboud Gouriye
Chairman
Platform Aram

Footnotes:

[1] The contribution of the Aramean nation to world civilizations is well-summarized by a world- renowned Eminent Oxford University Scholar Professor Sebastian Brock, a specialist on Aramaic (Syriac) and Hebrew, who said “Almost all societies are dependent upon the use of writing, but very few peoples realise that the great majority of the world’s scripts can be traced back to a common ancestor, an alphabet invented in the Middle East four thousands years ago, which was subsequently refined by the Phoenicians and the Aramaeans who spread it throughout the known world. It is thus without doubt one of the greatest gifts of the Aramean peoples to world culture.” (Hidden Pearl volume I: Page 27)

“…Nevertheless it is undeniable that the simple Aramaic alphabet of 22 letters has had the most extraordinary impact on the development of alphabetic writing systems throughout the world. Indeed, it is very hard to imagine how human culture and scientific learning could have progressed without (the Aramaic language).” (Hidden Pearl volume I: Page 58)
(Hidden Pearl: http://www.aramnaharaim.org/English/film_arameans.htm)

[2] 29-8-2007: Letter to the Iraqi Government: http://www.iraqichristians.org/English/Letter_Iraqi_Government_29_8_2007.htm
22-4-2008: Letter to the Iraqi Government:
http://www.iraqichristians.org/English/ArameanOrganisations_Protection_leaders_Iraq_25_4_2008.htm
10-5-2008: Letter to the United Nations:
http://www.iraqichristians.org/English/ArameansOrganisations_UN_Iraq_Help_10_5_2008.htm
31-10-2008: Letter to the United Nations:
http://www.iraqichristians.org/English/Aramean_Organisations_Letter_UN_31_10_2008.htm

[3] The result of this was that a part of our nation started identifying itself as “Chaldeans” (since the 16th century) and another part as “Assyrians” (since the 19th century). Roughly speaking, this division was due to the spiritual war between the Western political and spiritual colonial powers, that is to say the war between Catholics and Protestants, which was battled out at the cost of the Aramen nation, thereby planting doubts regarding their ethnic origin; with the result that a kind of spiritual genocide was committed against our nation.

A divided nation is obviously a weak nation. Through this division we have been made vulnerable to the hostile environment of the Middle-East where we are threatened with extinction and ethnic cleansing. The events which took place in Mosul, Baghdad and other areas in Iraq, where our nation was forced to leave their homes and heart, are vivid proof of our assertions.

[4] Aramean Genocide: Aramean Physical and Spiritual Genocide: The discussion around the genocide of 1915 is for an important part concentrated on the Armenian question and is called ‘Armenian genocide’. This is not fair, for not only the Armenians have suffered, but also the Aramean Indigenous Christian nation of Mesopotamia as well as the Greeks have suffered under these horrible acts, which cannot be described by pen and paper.

Contrary to the Greek and Armenian Genocides, the Aramean genocide consists of both Physical and Spiritual genocide.

—————————————————————–