In wanhoop, verwijst Hillary Clinton nu uitdrukkelijk naar haar beroep aan „Hard-Working Amerikanen, Witte Amerikanen,“ toevoegend dat zij op een bredere coalitie van kiezers - met inbegrip van wit een beroep doet dat geen Barack Obama in recente wedstrijden heeft gesteund.

„ik heb een veel bredere basis om een het winnen coalitie te bouwen,“ zij zei in een gesprek met DE V.S. VANDAAG. Als bewijsmateriaal, haalde Clinton een Bijbehorend artikel van de Pers aan „dat hoe Sen vond. De steun van Obama onder het werken, hard-working Amerikanen, witte Amerikanen, verzwakt opnieuw, en hoe het wit in beide staten die geen universiteit hadden voltooid me.“ steunde

„Er is een patroon dat hier te voorschijn komt,“ zij zei.

Kwamen de botte opmerkingen van Clinton over ras een dag na voorverkiezingen in Indiana en Behandelde Noord-Carolina symbolische en wiskundige slagen aan haar ambities van het Witte Huis.

Larry Sabato, hoofd van de Universiteit van het Centrum van Virginia voor Politiek, merkt vrij correct op dat begin de dag haar primaire steun niet blijkt zij meer electable is. Either Democrat will get “the vast majority” of the other’s primary election votes in a general election, he said, adding that Clinton’s comment was a “poorly worded” variation on the way analysts have been “slicing and dicing the vote in racial terms.” …..[more]

I construe Hillary’s comments as a suggestion that “blacks are lazy,”….a racial stereotype I expect to come from a ReTHUGlican and not a Democrat.

“Her statement seems to exclude African-Americans from being hard-working,” said Jamal Simmons, a Democratic strategist and CNN contributor, aligned to the Obama campaign, who is black. “Also, there are a lot of white Americans for Barack Obama. So it’s misleading and it’s not true,” said Mr. Simmons.

Mr. Simmons added:

“There is a very particular feeling that this couple(Bill and Hillary Clinton), that African-Americans had such regard for and trust in, has been at best dismissive towards Barack Obama and in many ways has used race and differentness as a weapon against him.”

Senator Diane Feinstein, a Clinton backer, has also indicated she wanted to hear “what Clinton’s strategy is,” adding: “The race is reaching a point now where there are negative dividends from it in terms of strife within the party.”

“Duck Hunting” Ma. Clinton however, appears unmoved by the “sniper-fire,” telling cheering supporters yesterday, in Charleston, West Virginia that the state’s primary next Tuesday, which she is expected to win, was “a test for me and a test for Senator Obama.”

I also find it odd that Latino voters who have been supporting her in large numbers are not included in the “Hard Working White” coalition….and what about blacks? Won’t she need the most consistently loyal Democratic party voting block, if she becomes the nominee?

The “Bitch of Chappaqua, New York” is in full Kamikaze (suicide) Mode….The “Hill” has become so selfish she doesn’t mind destroying the Democratic Party,…. and the “bitching and moaning” does not bode well for future female candidates.

LOL!

This woman is running amok, and if the DNC does not quickly “reject and denounce,” her — she will drive such a monumental wedge between the voters so much so that it will be next to impossible to unite the party for the general election.

Al Gore, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi and other big-wigs of the Democratic party need to step in and get this witch out of the race, before her “toxic waste” does extreme damage to the party…..and to Bill’s already “Lewinsky-Stained” legacy.

On the other hand, if she decides to ’surrender’ within the next week or two, it will a ‘joy’ to watch Hillary stumping enthusiastically for Obama in the general election — essentially denying her current charge(s); that Obama is elitist and out of touch with middle-America.

Can’t wait for that… LOL!

Popularity: 24% [?]