By: Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
   [ Enlarge ]
Continuing the series of articles on the insightful documentation provided by the Russian Military Officer, Explorer, and Orthodox Monk in his books about his deeds and excursions, observations and explorations in Abyssinia (undertaken over three years 1896 — 1899), I herewith republish the chapter on the History of Abyssinia that Bulatovich knowingly calls ‘Ethiopia’ erroneously.

The lengthy text (5133 words) is a complete collection of Western academic mistakes and misperceptions based mainly, and very often exclusively, on Abyssinian unsubstantiated claims, racist fallacies, and paranoid lies. The only possible use of this chapter is to help highlight the traps existing in every academic approach to the subject of the totally reconstructed, absolutely discontinuous and utterly delusional Abyssinian History the main purpose of which has always been to serve as pretext, support and justification of racist, expansionist, colonial and tyrannical claims expressed by the world’s most heinous and vitriolic state: fake ‘Ethiopia’.

For this reason, to this text I will dedicate a separate article — refutation of the fallacies indiscriminately accepted by Bulatovich because of the diplomatic targets he pursued during his travel and exploration. In forthcoming articles, I will republish further parts of Bulatovich’s book, but herewith I make first available a recapitulation of the earlier fourteen (14) articles of the series.

All the Oromos, Ogadenis, Afars, Sidamas and others, who fight for their independence, and all the neighboring countries, not only Egypt and Sudan but also Somalia and Eritrea, which are threatened because of the evil, eschatological dreams of Greater Ethiopia, must study, understand and diffuse the insightful documentation available in this book, which was published by the Russian explorer before 110 years; in and by itself it constitutes good reason for the world to be preoccupied with the source of every regional trouble and instability: the Amhara and Tigray (Tewahedo) Monophysitic Abyssinians who rule tyrannically over the lands they invaded and the nations they subjugated.

Recapitulation

Earlier articles of the present series can be found here:

1st Article: The Oromo Genocide Solemnly Confessed by Official Russian Explorer in Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia)

Selected and highlighted excerpts from a book — report published by a Russian explorer, military officer and monk, Alexander Bulatovich, who spent three years in Abyssinia, during the last decade of the 19th century. These excerpts undeniably testify to the Oromo genocide perpetrated by the invading Amhara and Tigray Abyssinian armies, and have therefore to be brought to the surface of political debate by the Oromo political and intellectual leaders at the local, regional and international levels.

2nd Article: Russia, the Oromos, Egypt, Sudan, Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia), Somalia, Islam & Orthodox Christianity

Republishing further excerpts from Bulatovich’s book, I focused on the possible reasons for Russia’s failure as colonial power in the region. As reasons I identified an inherent Russian quantitative approach to the colonial process and an overall misperception of the past and the present of Asia and Africa, which is due to the Russian academic, intellectual and ideological acceptance of the Anglo-French Orientalism, a bunch of disciplines elaborated by the French and the English academia in order to mainly promote and diffuse an interpretation of data that would suit the interests of the Anglo-French Freemasonry, namely the driving force of the Paris and London regimes.

3rd Article: Abyssinian Colonization of Oromia, Sidama and Kaffa in Bogus Ethiopia. An Early Witness from Russia

Another, longer, excerpt from Bulatovich’s ‘From Entotto to the River Baro’ which bears witness to the evil Amhara and Tigray plans of illegal occupation of the annexed lands and of tyrannical consolidation of the Abyssinian colonialism by means of settlements peremptorily implemented among the subjugated nations.

4th Article: Ethiopia (Oromo) vs. Abyssinia (Amhara). Unbridgeable Ethnic, Cultural Gap Revealed by Bulatovich

Two more excerpts that focus on the Oromo society, namely ‘Galla Clothing’ and ‘Galla Family Life’.

5th Article: Oromo National Identity Diametrically Opposed to Amhara Manner, Russian Officer Bulatovich Reveals

Three chapters dealing with Oromo national identity, religion and language. All the preconceived concepts of the colonial era are herewith present, thus leading Bulatovich to erroneous interpretations. Certainly, the Russian explorer was not a linguist, historian or historian of religions; more importantly, academic exploration was not the primary interest of his travel which was kind of diplomatic reconnaissance.

However, the chapter on the Oromo national character is greatly interesting because it demolishes the Ethiopianist myth of a supposed Ethiopian nation. There isn’t and there can’t be any Ethiopian nation other the one identified by the Ancient Greeks and Romans as located south of Egypt, which means the Ancient Kushites and Meroites of Sudan, who are the ancestors of today’s brotherly nations, the Oromos, the Sidamas and the Arabic-speaking Sudanese.

6th Article: Revelation of the Amhara Fornication: Light on the Anti-Christian Blasphemy of Fake Ethiopia

Further excerpts from the same volume of Bulatovich, providing with his description of the Abyssinians. Reporting accurately and truthfully, Bulatovich offered the Orthodox tsarist Russia’s top authorities a trustful portrait of the unclean and incestuous character of the pseudo-Christian Abyssinian society.

In just few paragraphs, he revealed a well hidden reality about the abysmal reality of the Abyssinian society, namely that, despite apparent faith similarities, the Amhara Tewahedo (Monophysitic) Abyssinians are not Christians; in fact, they constitute a desecrated society rejected by all Christian believers, because they practice a generalized fornication which is incompatible with the Christian creed, faith and principles.

With no family, there is no Christian society. As a matter of fact, Abyssinian eschatology is a corrupt system at the very antipodes of Christianity.

7th Article: Outrageous Falsehood on Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) Rejected: Solomonic Dynasty, Kingdom Do Not Exist

Further excerpts from the same volume of Bulatovich, providing with his description of the Abyssinians. Reporting accurately and truthfully, Bulatovich offered the Orthodox tsarist Russia’s top authorities a convincing presentation and analysis of how and why Abyssinian nobility does not exist — which consists in a formidable blow against the falsehood of the so-called Solomonic dynasty of Abyssinia, and their connection to the Ancient Hebrews. In fact, there has never been any post-Agaw Abyssinian ‘Kingdom’. The entire history of post-Agaw Abyssinia is a succession of uncivilized gangsters of incestuous origin, who were peremptorily called ‘noble men’, ‘kings’ or ‘emperors’; they were imposed as such to all the peoples and nations that, with Anglo-French permission and support, the Abyssinians invaded and subjugated.

Any incestuous ruler does not make a noble man, let alone king and emperor. In Ancient Assyria and Babylonia, these people were called “son of nobody”, and this exactly what all the anti-Christian, incestuous Abyssinian pseudo-kings have been. And wherever there is no noblesse, there cannot be any kingdom.

8th Article: Russian Officer Bulatovich Relates on Colonial Raids of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) in Kaffa Land I

The entire text of Bulatovich’s first excursion from Entotto to the River Baro,

9th Article: Russian Officer Bulatovich Relates on Colonial Raids of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) in Kaffa Land II

The entire text of Bulatovich’s second excursion from Entotto to the River Baro,

10th Article: The Evil, Colonial State of Abyssinia (fake Ethiopia) Exposed by Bulatovich, the Envoy of Russia

Chapters on the Ethiopian System of Government, the State Government and the Distribution of Land, the Police, the Judicial System and Procedure, the Law and Custom, the Crimes and Punishments, and the Economic Condition of the State — the Treasury.

11th Article — War Criminals of Abyssinia (fake Ethiopia), Their Atrocities Exposed by Bulatovich, Envoy of Russia

Chapter on the Abyssinian army; this part of Bulatovich’s text is also very critical because it highlights (see the section: ‘Conduct of War’) the inhuman practices of environmental disaster spread by the criminal robbers and inhuman soldiers of the Abyssinian state, which supported by England and France, perpetrated the worst atrocities ever attested on African soil and the world’s most appalling and multifaceted genocide.

12th article
The Nile, Egypt, Sudan Menaced by Evil Prophecy, Secret Expansion Plan of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia)

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/173476

Chapter on Menelik’s family, the ‘family of the emperor’. This chapter is of great importance for the diplomatic and national security services of Egypt and the Sudan, because it reveals what the heinous and rancorous Amhara and Tigray Monophysitic (Tewahedo) Abyssinians try to hide; namely that the regime, the elites and the upper classes of these incestuous and barbarous tribes act based on a secret program (that they call ?prophecy? because of their sick, abnormal and perverse minds) to destroy Egypt and Sudan, and expand their cannibalistic tyranny throughout East Africa.

13th article — Amhara Pseudo-History of Abyssinia (fake Ethiopia), False Assumptions of Bulatovich, Envoy of Russia

Chapter on the Sidamas and the African peoples. This part is full of inaccuracies, inconsistencies and wrong terms; it is clearly the topic Bulatovich explored less and had a most vague idea about. The reason is simple; he did not have the time for direct contact with any of them, being thus the victim of the customary and idiotic Amhara lies.

14th article — Heretic Christianity in Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia): Russian Errors, Benefits for England and France

Chapter on the Abyssinian church and faith that Bulatovich erroneously names ‘Ethiopian’; the attribution of the national name of Ancient Kush (Sudan) to Abyssinia relates to the Axumite King Ezana’s partly invasion of Ethiopia and destruction of its capital, Meroe, ca. 360 — 365 CE. That event had however a partly and momentary character that does not justify any further use from any Abyssinian ruler because that country was always located out of the historical borders of real Ethiopia. This is the reason the modern state is called Fake Ethiopia; its right name is just Abyssinia.

Information originating from different sources is made available in this chapter. Accuracy, veracity and correctness depend on the source; certainly Bulatovich had indeed a very strong Russian Orthodox theological background and a vast knowledge about the History of Early Christianity and Christian Patristic Literature. Wherever information is offered throughout this chapter, coming from this earlier acquired knowledge, Bulatovich is correct and truthful. Wherever modern religious practices of the Abyssinians are referred to, Bulatovich as a perspicacious observer can also be trusted.

However, Bulatovich’s text is unreliable wherever one of the following themes is involved:

a) Abyssinian religious and political history of the Islamic Ages; historical falsifications, mythical and fanatic beliefs, subjects of popular religious traditions and interpretative efforts of the past,

b) Abyssinian theological exegesis and hermeneutics, and

c) subjects relevant to History of Religions.

I find however quite pertinent Bulatovich’s effort to identify each of the main Abyssinian theological systems as oscillating between duophysitism to extreme monophysitism.

What escapes totally from Bulatovich approach is an academic, impartial stance toward his subject, namely Abyssinia, Abyssinians, and their beliefs. The reason is simple; Bulatovich was not an academic working of his own but the envoy of tsarist Russia, and as such, he sought to find out points of rapprochement, chances of cooperation, and perspectives of a Christian Orthodox alliance against the English and the French colonials who reflected the deep anti-Russian, anti-Orthodox, and anti-Christian interests of Freemasonry. He went out of his way to discern possibilities of Russian help to the Abyssinian monks in Jerusalem!

Had he truly focused on the subject, Bulatovich would have realized that his best allies would be the Copts and the Muslims of Egypt. In fact, Bulatovich failure to take facts at face value has cost Russia as much as the case of the Armenians who, although neighboring with Russia and partly belonging to St Petersburg’s authority, were more effectively manipulated by Paris and London during WW I — to their terrible prejudice of course.

Ethiopia through Russian Eyes

An eye-witness account of the end of an era, 1896-98 consisting of two books by Alexander Bulatovich

From Entotto to the River Baro (1897)

With the Armies of Menelik II (1900)

Translated by Richard Seltzer (Hidden Email Address, www.samizdat.com)

From Entotto to the River Baro

An account of a trip to the southwestern regions of the Ethiopian Empire 1896-97 by Lieutenant of His Majesty’s Life-Guard Hussar Regiment Alexander Bulatovich

Originally published in St. Petersburg, 1897, Printed by V. Kirshbaum, 204 pages

Reissued in 1971 as part of the volume With the Armies of Menelik II, edited by I. S. Katsnelson of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R.”Science” Publishing House Chief Editorial Staff of Oriental Literature Moscow 1971, entire book 352 pages, Entotto pp. 32-156

Translated by Richard Seltzer (from the 1971 edition)

History of Ethiopia

The name “Ethiopia,” which the Abyssinians give to their country, is a Greek word and in translation means “black face.” Homer called all of Central Africa “Ethiopia,” stretching from the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean to the Atlantic. Diodor the Sicilian distinguished three Ethiopias: Western — the Congo Basin, High — the present-day highlands of Ethiopia, and Eastern — which included the lower, east coast of Africa and South-Western Arabia.

In the history of Ethiopia, the following moments can be distinguished:

1. The period which preceded the Queen of Sheba. This period is almost completely unknown with regard to what is now Ethiopia, and apparently doesn’t have any connection with it.

2. The Queen of Sheba and the Solomonic 81 dynasty which followed her were displaced by King Del Noad of the Zagye dynasty in the year 901 A.D. According to the Abyssinian Tarika Negest, the Queen of Sheba, having heard about the greatness of Solomon, went to him and had by him a son named Menelik or Ybnakhakim.

There is much disagreement regarding the etymology of this word. Several believe that it derives from the Amharic words men which means “what” and alykh which means “you say.” In other words, “what you say or tell.” Others translate Menelik as “second I.” But the name Ybnakhakim, which is equivalent to Menelik, comes from the Arabic, and the most probable translation for that is “descended from a wise man.” Hakim — “wise” — was the Arabic name for Solomon.

The Queen of Sheba, Azyeb or the Southerner, also had many other names: Makeda and Nikola. The Abyssinians affirm that Aksum was her capital, but others say it was Yemen. There is also dissension among scholars on this question. Some, such as, for example, Patriarch Mendes and Bruce, 82 accept the legend about her journey to Solomon and consider her to be actually a queen of Aksum. Others (such as Pined) consider her to be an Arabian queen. Most probably, she ruled both present-day Ethiopia and the Arabian peninsula, at least part of the one and the other, since between Arabia and Ethiopia there was a close connection at that time, based on the continual migration of Semites to Africa.

The legend says further that Menelik, having come of age, was sent to Jerusalem. He was supposed to give Solomon gifts from his mother. Abyssinians have preserved the legend that at the time of his reception for the first time by Solomon, Solomon, wanting to test his son, stood in the ranks of his retinue, and on the throne placed one of his retainers. Menelik, although he had never seen his father, having first bowed to the man on the throne, did not give him the gifts, but rather began to search with his eyes among the retinue and, having finally seen Solomon, bowed to him.

He was very similar to his father and enjoyed great popularity. As a result of this, it is said that Solomon, having generously given him presents and many Levites, priests and children of many noble families, let him return to his homeland.

On leaving, Menelik, it is said, stole the Ark of the Covenant and one of the tablets of Moses.

He reigned under the name of David. He converted his whole people to Judaism and abolished idolatry in the country.

In the ninth year of the reign of Bazen, a king of this dynasty, Christ was born.

At the time of the fortieth king of this dynasty, Abrekh-Atsebakh, the light of Christian learning penetrated Abyssinia in the person of Saint Frumentius, called by the Abyssinians Aba Salama (343 A.D.)

From this dynasty in 521 A.D. there reigned King Kaleb who had undertaken a campaign against the Jewish King Zu-Nuvas, 83 well-known for his oppression of Christians of Nauad. Kaleb defeated Zu-Nuvas, and the Ethiopian kingdom was founded by the son of Kaleb, Abrekh, who then died at the siege of Mecca. His two sons were routed by the Persians and the kingdom was destroyed.

3. In 901 A.D. the Zagye dynasty was established and reigned until 1255 when on the imperial throne again appeared a king from the dynasty of Solomon thanks to the insistence of Saint Tekla Haymanot. The man who re-established the dynasty was Ikuna Amlak.

The most outstanding member of the dynasty of Zagye was King Lalibala, ranked by the Abyssinians as one of the saints. He is known as a builder of churches. Legend also attributes to him an attempt to divert the water of the Nile to the Red Sea.84

4. Beginning with Ikuna Amlak in the Tarika Negest more detailed descriptions make there appearance. This period, which continued until the invasion of Gran in 1534 A.D., is very similar to the Middle Ages in Europe. Apparently, in this era, the feudal system flourished. The king was only the first feudal lord of his kingdom. There existed individual land property of the gentry with hereditary rights and privileges.

From 1434 to 1468 Atye Zara Yakob reigned, and in his reign Ethiopia attained its highest brilliance of power and majesty.

He was an ardent Christian and was interested in church dogma. In his reign, a church council was convened, and the dogma was established about the Holy Trinity — one in nature and three in persons. The first relations with Europe were started by him.

At the time of the Florentine Council he wrote through Aba Nikodim, the father superior of the Abyssinian church in Jerusalem, a letter to Pope Eugene IV. He conquered Kaffa, Mocha, and Enareya and converted them to Christianity. According to tradition, he gave those lands their names. “Kaffa” comes from the word kefu which means “evil.” Mocha comes from mot, which means “death.” And Enareya in translation means “slaves,” since those who were conquered were turned to slaves.

After the death of Atye Zara Yakob, relations were opened with Portugal.

In Europe, the legend of “Prester John” circulated. He reigned somewhere in the East — in India or in Africa. The Portuguese King John sent John Covilha and Alfonso de Paiva to find him. The second died on the way, but the first reached Ethiopia, visited at the court of Atye Eskender and reported to his government that he had found “Prester John.”

When Eskender died, there ascended the throne the under-age Lebna Dengel, known by the name of David. His grandmother, Eleni, threatened from the east and the south by Mohammedans, sent Covilha with an Armenian named Matthew to the Portuguese King Dom Manuel with a request for help. In reply was sent a mission, consisting of Duarte Galvano, Rodrigo de Lima, Alvares and Bermudes. All of them, with the exception of Galvano, who died in the Kamaran Islands, reached David II in 1520.

The wars of Gran and the mission of Portuguese and Jesuits that took place then are sharply distinguished from the rest of the history of Ethiopia, almost constituting a separate epoch.

The Abyssinian Tarika Negest says almost nothing about these events. But Portuguese sources, and in particular Jeronimo Lobo (“Voyage historique d’Abyssinie”) 85, elucidates for us this epoch, which lasted from 1534 to 1635, when the Jesuits were expelled by Emperor Fatsilidas. 86

The embassy of Rodrigo de Lima and Alvares returned in 1526 and brought with them an Abyssinian monk — Saga za Ab or Christovl Likonat. Rodrigo carried with him a letter to the Portuguese king and Alvares carried one to the Pope. But in 1534 Gran appeared, and the frightened David sent Bermudes to the Portuguese king with a request for help and promise to adopt the Roman faith and give a third of his lands to the Portuguese.

King John III appointed Estevano da Gama, son of the famous Vasco da Gama, as viceroy of India. (“India” at that time was the name for all the eastern coast of Africa and present-day Abyssinia.)

He ordered him to destroy the Turkish and Arabian fleets in the Red Sea. He didn’t succeed in finding the Turkish fleet, and he put ashore 400 Portuguese under the command of Christovao da Gama (his brother) at Massawa. This landing of troops was very opportune since the Ethiopian empire was at that time in a critical position. Gran had for several years managed to put all of Abyssinia to fire and sword, beginning with Menjar and up to Aksum, which he torched and destroyed. But what kind of man was Gran and what were these hordes that came with him?

Lobo calls him a Moor from the cape of Guardafui and his horde also Moors (however, Portuguese called almost all Mohammedans “Moors.”) Bruce also calls his army “Moors.” In Portuguese sources he is called King of Adal and Emir of Zeila, and they conjecture that he was Somali. But how is this? In Lobo’s book, the entire east cost of the Gulf of Tajura is called Zeila, and nothing is mentioned of Harar, which at that time was a considerable city and an independent region. Evidently, he did not know about Harar. The province of Harar was originally populated by a people related by blood to Agau, Guragye and Kaffa — in other words, pre-Semitic inhabitants of the plateau.

Before their invasion into Ethiopia, the Galla occupied all the lands of Harar, and its surviving inhabitants gathered in one place and built the city of Harar and preserved their national independence up until that time. Both Galla and the people of Harar, who were close to the coast and consequently in the sphere of influence of Islam, were among the first to adopt Mohammedanism. According the unanimous traditions of the Abyssinians, Galla and people of Harar, Ahmad Gran was born close to Harar and was a Galla. The indication in history that he was king of Adal (the inhabitants of Aussa on the coast of the Gulf of Tajura, located to the north from the Somalis, are called Adalis) doesn’t prove anything, because, in all probability, he was the chief of the whole Mohammedan population, including Adalis and Somalis, and they, for a certainty, helped him in his campaigns. But the main part of his armies consisted of Galla.

This is demonstrated by the fact that all the conquered Abyssinian lands were settled by none other than the Galla — Galla of Wollo, Borena, and Tuluma. In the ranks of his armies were janissaries, Turkish riflemen and artillery, who were sent to him at his request after the defeat inflicted on him by the Portuguese. I give very little credence to the indication that the Adalis were armed with guns, since if in the last expedition of the Adalis to Aussa, instead of using Rozdan or Italian guns, they preferred to hang them on trees, then, I think all the more that, at that time, they were not capable of operating fire-arms.

The Portuguese who had landed were ceremoniously met by Eleni, who saw them as her saviors. The Emperor Galawdewos was at that time in Gondar. Da Gama went to him. At Belut the first battle with Gran took place, where 400 Portuguese, thanks to their fire-arms, completely crushed a many-times stronger enemy.

Nevertheless, in view of their small numbers, they were forced to spend the winter in Membret, surrounded by once again assembled hordes of Gran, to whom were now joined Turkish riflemen and artillery. In the battle that took place there, Christovao da Gama was killed, and the remaining Portuguese joined forces with Emperor Klavdiy in Damby. Gran went there and attacked Galawdewos, but the Portuguese Peter Lev killed him, and this decided the outcome of the battle and the Galla invasion. This happened in 1547.

Gran was an outstanding personality and to this day still lives in the memory of the people, who ascribe to him supernatural qualities. For example, they say that on the Chercher road a spring summoned forth from a stone by a stroke of Gran’s spear; and as evidence of that, they point to traces of his sword in the rock, etc. He was able to unite and direct toward a single general goal tribes that are extremely freedom-loving and independent, and of which, besides, some are completely different from others by their lineage and their language. The epoch of Gran threatened Abyssinia with terrible danger. But with his death, this danger went away, because neither before Gran nor after him was there a personality who could unite all these tribes together. Part of his forces went back, and part stayed on the conquered lands and engaged in raids against Abyssinians and civil war. In the south there continued a war of separate families for land, and the Galla, not stopping, a little at a time, gave way more and more to the west.

The despotism, exactingness, and lack of tact of the Portuguese meant that they could not excite sympathy toward themselves, and we see that discord began between Emperor Klavdiy and them, and that he expelled Patriarch Bermudes. But with this expulsion the pretensions of the Vatican on Ethiopia did not end.

We see a whole series of Catholic patriarchs of Ethiopia, a whole series of Jesuit missions, which busied themselves more with politics than faith, and relied more on the strength and prestige of Portugal than on their strength of persuasion. The results were the same as in the states of Europe — hatred of the people, civil war, plots, discord and finally the expulsion of the Jesuits. This was a significant period in the history of Abyssinia. Having started relations with Europe, freed by Europeans from ruin, Abyssinia was very close to complete unity with Europe, if only the Europeans had been a little more tactful and not so demanding. But instead of this, what happened was completely opposite. They had to save themselves from their saviors. And having learned such a lesson, the Abyssinians have been prejudiced against whites up until this time, and will be so even longer.

6. The epoch that followed this one, from 1635 to 1769, the year of the death of Atye Ayto Ioas,87 can be called the time of development of imperial power on the ground of the feudal system which had been destroyed by the Galla invasion. In this epoch was laid the foundation, which, completed by King Tewodros, would constitute the basis of today’s empire. This basis was the military organization of the empire and the fact that the well-being of everyone depended on the kindness of the emperor.

The native lands of the Abyssinians which had been conquered by the Galla were once again taken back by the emperors and, as if by right of conquest of new lands, were declared the property of the king. This produced a revolution in the life of the people. Up until that time in Abyssinia there existed class division: there were nobles, who owned land, and there were peasants, who worked half and half for large landholders. In this way a blow was dealt to the nobility, but the peasants continued to live in their former conditions, with this difference — that they became obligated for the land to the emperor himself. This revolution took place imperceptibly. At first only the legal situation was proclaimed — that all land belongs to the emperor. But by the smallest steps, little by little, lands were taken away and given to others. In addition, separate districts were formed which were responsible for some special service, for instance a district of spear carriers etc.

Each possesses a district on condition of known obligations to the empire. The small districts carried out the above named auxiliary service. Those that were more sizable were obliged to supply a known number of soldiers in time of mobilization. The number of soldiers depended on the size of the district.

In this manner, the old feudal system was completely destroyed, and a new foundation was established which gave the empire great strength. The population was divided into two parts. One went to the land on known conditions. The other grouped itself around the throne, the source of charity and prosperity, and placed all their hope in service to the emperor.

Around the emperors there formed a significant army, which they used more for the expansion of the boundaries of the empire than for internal wars, whereas before it had been the reverse. The army itself was almost obliged to conduct war, since without it there would be no means to satisfy its needs. Thus we see that the former citizens who took up arms only for self-defense, were turned into soldiers for whom war is a profession, and the hereditary feudal lords turned into non-hereditary polymarchs.

7. In this epoch the same cause which gave rise to the previous epoch now brought it down almost completely. This time, beginning with the death of Atye Ayto Ioas in 1769, continued to the accession to the throne of Emperor Tewodros II in 1855.

Due to the greatly increasing power of separate military leaders, civil wars occurred in the country. The strongest of the military leaders captured Begamedyr and crowned his pretender to the throne from the house of Solomon, having forced him to proclaim himself “Ras Bituaded.” And Begamedyr ruled the empire under this title. Among these Bituadeds was the remarkable dynasty of Ras Guksa. Guksa was the grandson of Ali the Great, a Galla Mohammedan, chief of the Iju tribe. 88 The descendants of Guksa for a long time disposed of the throne of Ethiopia by their arbitrary rule.

The reign of Tewodros II 89 marked the beginning of the revival of imperial power, which has now attained its apogee.

I am not going to enlarge upon the reigns of Tewodros II and Yohannes IV 90. In general outline, these reigns are well known to all, and in detail each of them could be the subject of a separate work. I will stop only at the history of the accession to the throne of Emperor Menelik and several years of his reign.

Menelik was the son of the Shoan Negus Haile Malakot, grandson of Sahle Selassie,91 (patron of Europeans) who is well known from the works of d’Hericourt.92 He traces his family from Solomon.

The kingdom of Shoa, separated from the rest of Ethiopia by Gallas of Wollo, kept its independence and ancient traditions and peacefully prospered while the rest of Ethiopia was torn apart with civil wars. Originally, the ruler of Shoa, one of the sons of Zara Yakob, had the title of meridazmatch.93 With the fall of imperial power, the meridazmatches of Shoa took the title of negus and declared themselves independent. Emperor Tewodros, having set his sights on uniting and restoring the empire, launched a campaign against Haile Malakot, the king of Shoa. In 1856, the Shoans were beaten, Haile Malakot was killed and the government of Shoa was given to the brother of Haile Malakot, Ato Ayale,94 with the title of meridazmatch. Eleven-year-old Menelik (who was born in 1845)95 was taken prisoner together with all the remaining relatives of Haile Malakot.

As soon as Tewodros went away, a brother of Ato Ayale who had fled, Ato Seyfu united with Ato Bezaby 96 and went against Ayale.

They defeated him and divided Shoa among themselves. But four years later, Tewodros returned to punish the rebels. Ato Bezaby was able to obtain pardon and gain the confidence of Tewodros, but Ato Seyfu fled and was killed. The government of the whole kingdom of Shoa was given to Ato Bezaby, who ruled until 1866, the time of the return of Menelik. That year, 20-year-old Menelik fled with only one slave Wolda Tadik (now Azzaj WoldaTadik, ruler of Ankober) to the ruler of Wollo. The son of thatruler was at that time in captivity at Tewodros’, and he, intending to do Tewodros a service and mitigate the lot of his son, put Menelik, who had come to him, in chains and decided to give him to the emperor. At this time news arrived that his son had been executed. In revenge for this, he freed Menelik and with honors and an escort sent him to Ankober.

Menelik ceremoniously entered there and was accepted by the populace as the legal king. The cruelty and injustice of Ato Bezaby for the time when he governed the region succeeded in setting the whole population against him. Around Menelik quickly gathered the former soldiers of his father and grandfather, and he declared himself negus. Having learned of all this, Ato Bezaby, who has at that time at the borders of Shoa, hastened to Ankober with his whole army, but the day before the battle all the soldiers wentover to the side of Menelik. Bezaby was taken prisoner and the negus, having forced him to pay a fine of 2000 talers for “disrespect to the legal king,” pardoned him. Regarding this episode, I heard the following story, that on the day of battle not accompanied by anyone, Menelik set out for the enemy side; and that with a speech, in which he declared himself the legal king and gave himself into their hands, he drew them all to his side. Later Bezaby again rebelled and paid for it by dying. In 1868 Magdala fell and King Tewodros killed himself.

After a short interregnum the Tigrean Dajazmatch Kassa ascended the throne and was crowned in 1872 under the name of Yohannes IV. Negus Menelik at first did not recognize him and in the year of his accession to the throne wrote a letter to the English resident in Aden, explaining his legal right to the imperial throne. In 1881 Emperor Yohannes, pursuing, as had Tewodros, the idea of uniting and restoring the empire, went against Menelik. The matter did not reach a battle, since Menelik, having secured beforehand the consent of Yohannes, went to him at his camp with an expression of submissiveness — a stone around his neck. Yohannes pardoned him and confirmed him in kingly dignity.

The personality of Emperor Yohannes was in the highest degree remarkable. He was a Christian fanatic and made up his mind not to have any Moslems among his subjects. He forcibly converted them to Christianity. Just as Tewodros, he dreamed of the restoration of the greatness of the Ethiopian empire. He intended for the empire to consist of four kingdoms: Tigre, Gojjam, Wollo, and Shoa. In each kingdom he intended to have a separate bishop and to this end he sent for four abunas from Alexandria, paying 10,000 talers for each. In 1881 he, with this aim, crowned as the Gojjam negus Ras Adalya, who took the name of Negus Tekla Haymanot. But the great plans of Emperor Yohannes were not destined to come true. In 1889 he was accidentally killed at the siege of Metamma.

At that time Menelik, supported by Italy, had put together a conspiracy with Negus Tekla Haymanot against Yohannes. Relations of Menelik with Europe began from the very first year of his rise to the throne of Shoa. When Italy took Assaba there started up the most lively relations between him and it.

Having aroused his ambitious intentions, Italy thought to raise Menelik against Yohannes and having divided them to conquer them, separately, following the principle of “divide et impera” [divide and conquer.]

The Red Sea coast belonged to Ethiopia up until the seventeenth century. But with the loss of a large part of its lands at the time of the Galla invasion it also lost the coastal region. In 1557 Massawa was taken by the Turks where gave it to the Egyptians in 1866. In 1869 the Italian steamship company Rubatino bought from the Adal Sultan of Rakheyta, Beregan, the port of Assaba with adjacent territory up to Rakheyta, and in 1879 gave all this to the Italian government.

From this time there were engendered in Italy interests in Eastern Africa, and Italy used every chance to expand its possessions. In 1881 a convention was concluded with Beregan, the Sultan of Rakheyta, concerning the mission of the Italian protectorate (perhaps this convention was just as hollow as the Treaty of Wichale). On March 15, 1883, a treaty was concluded with the Aussa Sultan about free transport of goods through his possessions. On May 22 1883 a commercial treaty was concluded with Menelik, negus of Shoa. In 1885, the Egyptians abandoned Massawa and their possessions on the eastern shore, and Massawa was slowly taken by Italy. The new possessions received the name of the Eritrean Colony, and with this was laid the beginning of the struggle between Italy and Abyssinia which so tragically ended for Italy last year.

Italy was extremely interested in these new acquisitions. Diplomatic ties were begun with Ethiopia. A whole series of travelers set out to study the country, and many of them paid for it with their life (Jullietti was killed in 1881, Bianchi was killed in 1884, Count Porro, Chiarini). 97 Ambitious plans were engendered in Italy.

In 1887 the first catastrophe happened. Considering the seizure of the territory adjacent to Massawa an encroachment on his rights, Emperor Yohannes sent his best military leader, Ras Alulu, who at Dogali destroyed an entire Italian detachment of 500 men. This led to the equipping that same year of an entire expedition which without opposition took Saati in 1888.

An Italian diplomat, Count Antonelli, energetically worked at this time to sow discord and civil war in the country. They incited Menelik against Yohannes, promised him support and supplied him with arms. They also tried to incite the Gojjam Negus to revolt. In 1888 the Sultan of Aussa accepted the protectorate of Italy.

Negus Menelik, who for a long time had felt his dependence on the emperor as a burden, conspired against the Emperor Yohannes, having agreed to act together with the Gojjam Negus Tekla Haymanot. Emperor Yohannes, having found out about this, wrote insulting letters to both of them with the threat of punishing them. But his position was difficult. Enemies surrounded him from all sides. Having left the Italians, Yohannes went against the Gojjam King and forced him to submit again. Having finished with him, Yohannes wanted to deal the same with his second opponent, Menelik, but at this time in the west dervishes swept into Galabat, and Yohannes, putting off the punishment of Menelik for another time, proceeded against them, where he was killed at the siege of Metamma on March 11, 1889.

When he received news of the death of Yohannes, Menelik immediately went to Gondar where he was crowned emperor. Between him and Negus Tekla Haymanot, who also had a claim on the imperial throne, civil war broke out, which ended in the complete victory of Menelik, who took from his opponent almost all the land to the south of the Abbay River and left him only his native possessions.

Ras Zaudi was appointed Ras Bituaded in Begamedyr, but he soon conspired against Menelik. At first, it seemed that everything favored Zaudi, but at the decisive minute the troops went over to the side of their legal king. Zaudi was captured, put in chains and to this time still lives on one of the mountains in Ankober.

The government of Menelik was distinguished for its justice, restraint, lawfulness and concern for the people and the army.

The war cry of his soldiers: Aba Danya — “father judge” (the name of his horse) — serves as his best character reference.

For the soldiers he did not grudge them money nor food and tirelessly tried to obtain as many more guns as he could. His popularity was very high, and the number of his troops grew. He divided them into regiments of 1000 men each, and gave them to rulers in the outlying districts, to ensure against rebellion by those rulers. His reign was marked by continuous wars against the Gallas and constant expansion of territory. He had some outstanding military leaders: Ras Gobana, Fitaurari Gabayu and several others. Ras Gobana is now a legendary personality in Abyssinia. He was a Galla, a remarkable cavalryman, an outstanding athlete and courageous man. He conquered for Menelik all the Galla lands to the west from Entotto to Beni-Shangul and to the southwest to the River Baro, to the east and south together with the Emperor he conquered Harar, Arussi and Guragye.

He died in 1890 as a result of an accidental fall from a horse during a game of guks. Arussi was conquered in 1886. In 1887 in a battle at Chialanko, Emir Abdulakhi was defeated; and a result of his defeat was the annexation of Harar. In 1892 Walamo was subdued. In 1896 Menelik covered himself with glory at Adowa and showed Europe that such was the present-day Ethiopia and such is her power.

But we will turn to a continuation of the history of the relations of Menelik with Italy. Making use of the troubled times, of the change of regimes, the Italians tried to seize as much land as they could, and succeeded in doing so. In the year that Menelik ascended the imperial throne, they concluded with him the Treaty of Wichale. That is so well known that I won’t say anything further about it.98

The friendship of Italy, which at first was advantageous for Menelik, now became a burden for him, thanks to the claims and seizures of the Italians. Relations quickly changed for the worse and ended in an open break and war. At this time another power, interested in the failure and weakening of Italy — France — appeared to help Menelik. France also owned the coast of the Red Sea which was closest to Shoa and Harar. In 1862, Frenchmen bought Oboka. In 1884 established a protectorate over the Somali coast of the Gulf of Tajura from Ras-Dumeyra (to the south of Rakheyta) to the well of Hadu (to the south from Jibuti). In 1888 the spheres of influence were demarcated between France and England. In 1886 was established the governorship of Oboka and the Somali coast, and from this time France had active official relations with Abyssinia, vigilantly and jealously following its politics.

The help of France to Menelik at the time of his struggle with Italy consisted of admission and delivery of firearms. We know how this struggle ended. We are familiar with its details. And the war that followed is fresh in our memory.

From this short outline we see that the history of Ethiopia is one of continual war with both internal and external enemies.

The basis of imperial power can only be actual military strength, and on the army as on a foundation, has been built all the rest of the edifice of the Ethiopian Empire. What kind of an army is this?

Footnotes to Entotto

B: = Bulatovich, author
K: = Katsnelson, editor of the Russian reprint
S: = Seltzer, translator

81 K: Here and farther on, A.K. Bulatovich tells legends which do not have anything in common with historical reality and which evidently arose in the surroundings of the Ethiopian clergy, who wanted to sanctify the origin of the Ethiopian state and of the ruling dynasty with the help of Biblical tradition.

82 K: J. Bruce (1730-1794), a well-known traveler in Africa, was Scottish in origin. He explored the coast of the Red Sea and Ethiopia, and spent time in the Sudan and other countries. IN 1770 he discovered Lake Tana and the source of the Blue Nile. His description of his travels has been published many times (J. Bruce, Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile in the Years 1768-1773, volumes 1-8, third edition, Edinburgh, 1813).

83 K: A.K. Bulatovich uses an unusual transcription system for proper names. He is talking about the Hamitic king Zu-Nuvas, who adopted Judaism under the name of Joseph.

84 K: The project of Lalibala is explained by the desire to deprive Egypt of water, to doom it to starvation.

85 K: Jeronimo Lobo, Historia de Etiopia, Coimbre, 1669.

86 K: Fatsilidas ruled from 1632 to 1667.

87 K: Ioas I (Adyam Sagad III) ruled from 1755 to 1769.

88 K: The Iju tride, more precisely the Ittu, belongs to the eastern Galla.

89 K: Tewodros II reigned from 1855-1868. The politics of Tewodros II, which were directed toward the centralization of the country, aroused the discontent of the feudal lords and acted against the colonization intentions of England. Having seized on the murder of Consul Cameron and of several Europeans, the English in 1867 disembarked in the Port of Zeila and besieged Fort Mardalu, where Tewodros II was seeking refuge. Seeing no escape from the situation that had arisen, he shot himself.

90 K: Yohannes IV (1868-1889) was a protege of England. Incited by England, he went to war with the Mahdists and was killed in battle.

91 K: Sahle Selassie, the ruler of Shoa (1813-1847), was the grandfather of Menelik II.

92 K: C.E.X. Rochet d’Hericourt, a French traveler, twice visited Ethiopia and gave special attention to the region of Shoa. (See his works: Voyage sur la cote orientale de la Mer Rouge dans la pays d’Adal et le royaume de Choa, Paris, 1841; Second voyage sur les deux rives de la Mer Rouge dans le pays des Adels et le royaume de Choa, Paris1846).

93 K: Meridazmatch, more precisely meredazmatch (from meredi “he who compels to tremble” and azmatch “warrior”) is a title which was conferred on the commander of the reserve corps.

94 K: Ato Ayale (Haile Mikael) was the son of Sahle Selassie and uncle of Menelik II.

95 K: Menelik II was born on June 18, 1844.

96 K: Abagach Bezabe was a pretender to the throne of Shoa. Abagach, “father of the army on campaign,” is a title which was given to the commander of the army or the ruler of a border region (in this case it corresponded excellently with “margrave.”) Bezabe was appointed by Emperor Tewodros. Regarding these events, see: Guebre Sellassie, Chronique du regne de Menelik II, roi des rois d’Ethiopie, volume 1, Paris, 1930, pages 86-106.

97 K: D. Porro and his fellow travelers were killed in the spring of 1886 on order of the ruler of Harar. Chiarini died in 1979.

98 K: For the official diplomatic documents see: C. Rossetti, Storia diplomatica dell’ Etiopia durante il regno di Menelik II, Torino, 1910.

————————————————————————————————————————————————

————————————————————————————————————————————————

   By: Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
   [ Enlarge ]
The fact that England’s one time one-penny newspaper, the Daily Telegraph, found it necessary to have one of his one-penny staffers publish an urged and premature denunciation of what the so-called conspiracy theorists may have later identified as reasons for the assassination of Poland’s president Lech Kaczynski demonstrates the absolute paranoia of the ruling elite that plunged the entire Mankind in the unprecedented and abysmal chaos of our times.

Paranoia is an utterly inhuman situation; the normal, human reaction of someone rejecting the assassination scenario would be to first wait until the day a commentator or analyst publishes an analysis of the reasons for which the air plane crash should be interpreted as an assassination, and then come up with a refutation.

A Preventive Measure

To act beforehand, and publish as early as April 10 a rebuttal of a ?. non published text, is an act that reflects guilt and complot; the latter is due to the fact that the author did not write an article of his own, out of his free will, but executed orders of his secretive superiors. I will describe below the reasons for my postulation. The complot mirrors clearly a thought of the type “before anyone accuses us of an assassination, let one of us say this is a non option”. Preventive measure for paranoid and inhuman beings to take.

The inhuman mentality that drives people to this sort of thought belongs to gangsters; and gangsters truly rule currently the present world, totally disregarding values, ethics, principles and concepts that typified the Mankind as such over the past millennia.

The aforementioned is the explanation of why most of the people worldwide find the majority of the current socioeconomic and political developments as absolutely absurd. They are absurd because they serve the interests of the few secretive gangsters (who do their ingenious best to hide) and oppose the interests of the outright majority of the world population; by this, I mean exactly 99.9%.

The materialization of the aforementioned type of thought by means of authoring a piece of disinformation in one of the world’s highest circulation newspapers reflects guilt; the perpetrators act in full acknowledgement of their criminal deeds that they try to hide by diverting the public interest to other issues and by attempting to beforehand discredit all those who would publish anything that could reveal the identity of the cruel perpetrators.

Of course, through the aforementioned, I don’t mean that the English newspaper and the petty journalist are involved in the complot; the hideous undertaking against a state, an administration, and a president who tried to stick to their values and ensure a significant degree of independence from the global dictatorship system was of colossal dimensions and multi-perplex.

The Daily Telegraph

Integrally incorporated into the global system, mass media like the Daily Telegraph do not even need to receive an order and a directive about what to publish in cases of similar crises. Most of their key staffers have been properly and timely educated in the secretive meetings that take place twice per week and thus effectively introduce every novice and every apprentice into the realities of the present world and the interests of the secretive organization. That’s why these staffers have been hired or have not been fired. Some of them may be under-qualified but this matters little, because they are “ours”. They are therefore fully capacitated to address almost every situation and every publication need that may arise.

One should remember some details about the Daily Telegraph; it would be an erroneous and ridiculous assumption to imagine that the newspaper serves the interests of the average English. The Freemasonic, Zionist paper was bought by a 19th century English Jew and Freemason, Joseph Moses Levy who already owned the Times, an expensive newspaper at the time; defending anti-religious, anti-Christian and anti-human ideas under the masquerade of “liberalism” and “colonialism”, the Daily Telegraph made vast parts of the world, Africa, Middle East, Asia, Balkans, etc. bleed ceaselessly and undeservedly. This was done as a service to the world Freemasonic order and the then nascent international Zionism, a minor offspring of the evil organization that intends to destroy all the religions in the name of Satan.

For any non-specialized reader with little knowledge about History, suffice it here to say that all the troubles that people currently face on the territories of the former Ottoman Empire, Safavid Iran and Mogul India, Eastern and Sub-Saharan Africa, Central Asia, Eastern and Central Europe are due to conspiracies promoted through the pages of the Daily Telegraph, and other similar publications of falsehood and disinformation. Termed as the “largest, best and cheapest newspaper in the world” (according to Joseph Moses Levy himself), the newspaper was initially managed by Levy’s son, Edward Levy-Lawson, a particularly lewd and villainous person who bought his pseudo-noble title of baron by paying his pocket money to the English monarchy.

Damian Thompson — or just Damien

Written by Damian Thompson, an English Freemason, the aforementioned article consists in a preventive attack against potential revelators. For those who still remember ?the Omen’, Damien was the name of the Antichrist himself, and Mr. Thompson did his ingenious best to reproduce the sardonic smile of that movie’s protagonist in the much publicized pictures of his.

Under the title “Polish president killed in plane crash: the conspiracy theorists will go crazy“, the article features typically Freemasonic methods of written composition that are employed to spread confusion. Note at this point that it is quite typical of several Freemasons to take anti-Freemasonic positions in order to put under control or divert others’ initiatives.

In fact, Satan cannot survive without confusion, and this is the reason for which Freemasons are experts on the subject.

Typical sample:

“And I can say with confidence that they are being cooked up, because Poland, like most East European countries, is obsessed with conspiracies. Russians, Jews, Americans, Freemasons — they will all be blamed.”

The text expresses extreme deprecation for Poland and most East European countries. Now, if you convert the geographical masquerade into ethno-linguistic realities, you have the plain understanding. East Europe means mainly Slavs; here you have the revelation of the traditional Freemasonic Anti-Slavism which involved many political attempts of division and affliction over the past few centuries.

There is no need to expand much on this point now; the betrayal of the last tsar Nicholas II by his Freemasonic allies, the governments of France and England, in WW I highlights the deep Freemasonic hatred of the Slavs. This hatred is multi-faceted: anti-Orthodox, anti-Catholic, anti-Bogomil, and anti-Varangian. This in and by itself demonstrates the Freemasonic apostasy.

The aforementioned statement includes a truth — in reverse (like every Freemasonic statement); this is how it should be read:

“And I can say with confidence that they are not being cooked up, because Poland, unlike most West European countries, is not compacted with tyrannically — freemasonically imposed inanity.”

Textual Analysis

In the latter sentence of the selected excerpt, the bulk of the confusion is aptly phrased. What do Russians, Americans, Jews and Freemasons have in common?

Nothing.

Except, they are herewith utilized under specifically known connotations that had been timely diffused and imposed allover the world by the Freemasonic mass media over the past decades; they can therefore function as points of a linguistic field of confused semiotics.

By amalgamating all this stuff, the author attempts to divert the interest of his readers from the only way that leads to the correct understanding and the accurate perception of realities. What a confusion indeed!

Two nations that have been rival super powers on ideological (not nationalist) grounds that do not exist anymore;

Believers of one rather minor religion (Judaism) that has been particularly targeted by the Zionist establishment, which undertook the Palestine / Israel project in the name of Judaism and at the same time at the detriment of the same religion;

And a secretive organization renowned for its involvement in politics allover the world.

Then, why mention Americans and Russians as if they are independent from the Freemasonry? Freemasonic lodges rule America while also being active in Russia. There, they even managed to promote their member, agent and puppet at the country’s presidency: Medvedev is a Zionist Jew and Freemason.

On the other hand, why mention Jews and Freemasons, since Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Taoists, Confucians, Hindus, and believers of other religions can also be initiated into the evil “mysteries” of Freemasonry?

All this is a nonsensical effort to fool readers and keep Europe hidden and out of the picture.

Mentioning Russia and America and being oblivious of Europe, in a context whereby the Freemasonic order is also referred to is very odd. The approach is in striking contradiction with all official versions of history of the Freemasonic order; according to them, the first Freemasonic lodges were established in the early 18th century in Europe. Not n Russia; not in America; not by Jews.

This effort to spread confusion about the assassination of the president of Poland is situated on a well prepared ground of misinformation. This concerns a big game of international propaganda. The game’s name is the “Brazen Russian”.

The Brazen Russian Game

Russians are a highly civilized nation of Europe. At any time a historical record was written about them in the past, the Russians were always on European soil. They certainly expanded in Asia; but the French and the English expanded in Asia too.

Are the French and the English Asiatic nations because of their colonization of India, Indochina and territories of the Ottoman empire?

Certainly, the Russians, and their ancestors, be they Varangians or Slavs, originate from Asia, not Europe; but so do the Germans, the Scandinavians, the French, the English, the Celts, the Cimmerians, the Huns, the Greeks and the Romans.

At the times of the Mesopotamian zikkurat and the Egyptian pyramids, there was no Europe — but there was Asia and Africa.

These fundamental truths have been deliberately obscured by the Freemasonic academia of England and France. Discussing the issue at the political level, we come to notice today that similarly veiled is perestroika’s and post-communist Russia’s willingness to become part of the modern European House.

As a matter of fact, Russia has been repeatedly, undeservedly and intentionally humiliated, repudiated, and expulsed from Europe; this occurred in the 90s but also earlier. What seemed possible in 1991, namely that Russia — along with all the Eastern European countries — would join the European Union at a later date, became no one’s dream in 2010. The escalation has started, but the game is old and so are the patterns and the basic lines on which developments are being unfolded.

In fact, the game is as old as the colonial times, and it dates back to the 18th century, when France and England needed a scarecrow in the East. The otherwise unnecessary efforts of various tsars to promote a Russian — Italian (Eastern Roman and Western Roman) cultural assimilation or a Russian — German rapprochement (Varangian Russians and Germans are practically speaking of the same origin) did not matter much for the evil Anglo-French Freemasonic elites, and their needs of a political Manichaeism (namely a fallacious division between “civilized West” and “barbaric East”). They disregarded them to promote their fallacious vision that corresponded to their evil and calamitous plans.

Russia’s expansion to the South, which was mistakenly and unsuccessfully carried out by the tsars, corresponded perfectly well to the Anglo-French Freemasonic plans for a drastic destabilization and decline of the Ottoman Empire that the Westerners were already calling Turkey, and of the Iranian Empire that the Westerners were already calling Persia. It was all coordinated with the English and French involvement in India. Thus, Russia became a scarecrow.

Russian Straightforwardness vs. Anglo-French Freemasonry

As one can easily understand, a scarecrow never wins; it is merely used according to the interests of the users, As long as Russia kept Istanbul and Esfahan busy in the Balkans, Caucasus and Central Asia warfronts, the English and the French were able to make their preparations for a prevalence in North Africa and Western Asia – which would be of global scale consequences.

The evilness of the Freemasonic Anglo-French plan was not perceived either by the Orthodox tsars or by the Muslim Sultan and Shah. When the Russian army marked some success against the Ottomans and / or the Iranians, the British and the French rushed to help Istanbul and Esfahan, because the success should never be overwhelming.

When the Russians succeeded to influence Orthodox populations in the South Balkans (1770), the Anglo-French allowed the Sultan to impose a “white terror” and hired selected locals, mainly but not exclusively originating from minorities, to properly “educate” them in Paris and London, and thus adjust them to their interests and further utilize them for the major plan of Freemasonic immoral, illegal and inhuman infiltration in the Ottoman Empire and Iran.

The Tsars failed to understand that their infiltration in the Ottoman Empire and Ira was very different from that of the Anglo-French; indeed, the Russian penetration and contact with selected locals was at a “superficial” level, namely that of the common Christian Orthodox faith. This was human, understandable to some extent, and mostly devoid of corruption. There was no further secrecy involved, and the bond was not irrevocable. The pro-Russian activists of the 18th and 19th century Ottoman Empire could eventually (and many times did) find it better to stop working with the foreign and cooperate with their own country’s authorities.

On the other hand, the Anglo-French infiltration in the Ottoman Empire took the form of

1)   deep and inhuman corruption,

2)   detachment of every victim from his own social, economic, political, socio-behavioural, cultural, religious and spiritual milieu,

3)   initiation into the otherwise alien and Satanic rites of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge, and

4)   extensive practices of bribery, financial corruption and personal — professional promotion in exchange with the deceived victim’s immoral acceptance of the Freemasonic rituals.

The Inhumanity of the Freemasonic Hierarchy

In this regard, the deception was basically due to the evil and inhuman hierarchical structure of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge; this structure is deceitfully used to force an otherwise ignorant, gullible and unsuspicious person to accept in the first initiation slightly different and odd rites, concepts and ideas, without knowing that further familiarity with these rites, concepts and ideas will lead him to later acceptance of other odder and even more different rites, concepts and ideas, which he would have never accepted in the beginning, had he been offered a “complete” initiation all at once. In other words, no one would have become member of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge, if all the secrets of all degrees (1st to 33rd and beyond) had been “revealed” to him all at once.

As it can be easily understood, the Russian quest for warm water ports turned out to be a scarecrow’s dream; such a dream could never be materialized. Yet, the Anglo-French infiltration could have been outmaneuvered — through accurate perception of the then realities, identification of foe targets, and appropriate action.

As it happened, the Russians, moving from parts of the tsarist territories in Transcaucasia, failed to advance beyond Van in today’s Eastern Turkey in WW I, and they never succeeded to reach key areas, such as Tur Abdin in Northern Mesopotamia, the so-called Mt. Athos of Aramaean Christianity, the Kochanes Patriarchate of the Nestorians Aramaeans, nearby Julamerg (today’s Hakkari) in Northern Transtigritane (Southeastern confines of Turkey), and Mosul, the venerated capital of Northern Mesopotamia — let alone Jerusalem, which was the “terminus” of all tsarist imperialists’ and Orthodox Christian ecumenists’ eschatological visions.

Contrarily, the English and the French, moving from Western Europe, arrived, settled, controlled and tyrannized Egypt, Phoenicia (that they fallaciously called Lebanon in order to destroy the modern Phoenicians’ national identity, cultural integrity, and diachronic historicity), Palestine, Arabia, and last but not least, Mesopotamia!

Russians Fooled with Anglo-French Freemasonic Fallacies

The Brazen Russian Game proved to be very successful, because the tsarist diplomats did not bother to outmaneuver it. Worse, the Russian academia gullibly fell into the trap of the Anglo-French academic and scholarly fallacies, by engaging in the fake intellectual paths and interpretational systems of Sorbonne, Oxford and Cambridge, and by accepting the prefab systems of Hellenism, Orientalism, Arabism and Islamism that can serve only the interests of the Freemasonic world domination, and the associated historical disinformation, national and religious identity loss, and socio-behavioural — cultural alteration.

The early Russian Hellenists and Orientalists failed to understand that the prefab Anglo-French systems were not only inherently invalid and fallacious, but also diametrically opposed to the values and concepts of Orthodox Christianity (with Moscow posturing as Third Rome) that they were logically expected and supposedly committed to promote and diffuse.

This situation ended up in a tremendous damage for Tsarist Russia; the Russians were thus constrained to view the World (or at least a vast part of it, including Africa, Asia and Europe) through the fallacious Anglo-French, Freemasonic lenses that were of course beneficial to the West European Freemasons but detrimental to the Orthodox Russians.

The tsarist foreign policy in Asia and Africa would have been very different, had the Russian universities, research centers, and academies established a Russian Christian Orthodox system of Humanities based on Christian Orthodox — and not on Freemasonic — values, concepts and ideas.

An alliance with Istanbul and Esfahan was imperative indeed for St. Petersburg in order to consolidate the Ottoman rule from the Atlas to the Horn of Africa and to launch a joint Russian, Ottoman and Persian attack against the British in India.

This policy would allow for Russian expansion in South Asia, Ottoman and Persian consolidation, and — more importantly — tripartite cooperation in view of a successful containment of the Anglo-French colonialism. The failure to contemplate in terms of landmass supremacy over the seas caused the end of Tsarist Russia.

Calamitous Tactics Projected onto the Russians

The Brazen Russian Game involves the following tactics that are projected onto the targeted, gullible victims, namely the Russians:

1 –   forceful push in short term tactics – The idea that a small advance and territorial gain is a positive step ahead is utterly idiotic because it is based on a quantitative approach.

2 –   insistence on, and satisfaction with, small territorial benefits or acquisitions – Consequence of no 1, which was particularly highlighted in the recent Russian invasion in Southern Ossetia and Abkhazia

3 –   bad neighborhood relationships (due to nos 1 & 2) enabling rivals to perfectly utilize / instrumentalize the concerned, smaller or weaker, neighbors This is a unique case at the global level, involving at different times Finland, the Baltic countries, Poland, Germany, Austria — Hungary, Romania, Moldova, the Ottoman Empire, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Ukraine and China! One has to add occupied territories as well, namely Dagestan, Ingushetia, etc. Due to the projection of this tactics onto the Russian establishment, the Russians failed to understand that a Russian-friendly, independent Dagestan would be far better for Moscow’s interests than a Russian-unfriendly, occupied Dagestan whereby thousands of Saudis and other radicals want to go, fight and die (of course not for the real Islam but for the Satanic interests of the Freemasonic order). Similarly, in the recent case of the Russian invasion in Southern Ossetia and Abkhazia, the real, long term loser was Moscow.

4 –   lack of overhaul strategy – As example, I mention here the tsars’ inability to strike an alliance with the sultans against the English and French presence in Eastern Mediterranean, Egypt and Algeria in the middle of the 19th century, which would mean a Christian Orthodox — Islamic alliance against the Freemasonic Anglo-French and at the same time, harbour facilities for the Russians in Alexandria; Russia’s absolute failure was underscored at the Crimean War.

5 –   inability to prevent the rivals from expanding – This is due to total lack of strategic thinking and analysis of the rivals’ strategic targets. There was not a single mid-19th century Russian analyst, strategist, diplomat, historian or thinker to identify the Anglo-French targets against the Ottoman Empire, from the gradual colonization of most of its territories to the exploitation of its natural resources (the Arabic Peninsula Oil).

In fact, the tsar, fighting against the sultan in WW I, was truly making war on his own country.

The Brazen Russian Game involves the following efforts deployed by the Anglo-French Freemasonic diplomacies:

1 –   hypocritical indifference for, or theatrical weakness in front of, forceful Russians pushes undertaken within short term tactics – This policy is geared in order to aggravate the Russian boldness (bravado or nerves); it gives Russians a fake feeling of success and makes them conclude that their tactics are successful. But at the same time, Moscow’s rivals advance their long term strategies, materializing their plots and preparing their traps, while being duly unnoticed.

2 –   devastating anti-Russian propaganda purposefully undertaken in the aftermath of small Russian territorial benefits or acquisitions – This serves Paris and London in many aspects, such as a. wide diffusion of the false concept that the Russians are different, Asiatic, alien; and b. easy adoption and execution of any anti-Russian adventures whenever needed, without inner opposition

3 –   perfect utilization of bad neighborhood relationships that they triggered in the first place — The Russians should therefore study the case of the Armenians, the Greeks, the Serbs, the Egyptians, and the Hedjaz Arabs who have all been utilized against the Ottoman Empire and severely damaged. Istanbul collapsed of course but this was mainly due to the Sultans’ inability to identify and outmaneuver the Armenians’, Greeks’, Serbs’ and others’ utilization by the Anglo-French. Moscow is currently found in the same position as Istanbul before 100 years.

4 –   overhaul strategy perfectly serving the eschatological, messianic plans of the Apostate Freemasonic lodge that controls the Anglo-French regimes and their dependencies. Failure to identify the eschatological, messianic axes and hidden targets of the Anglo-French in vast parts of the former Ottoman Empire — particularly in relation with the creation of a state under the pseudonym “Israel” — guarantees another devastating defeat for the Russian dreams.

5 –   perfect containment of the Russians. It is clear that the Anglo-French Freemasonic diplomats and academia would reject the aforementioned, pretending that it is not true that the “forceful push in short term tactics” is a tactics projected by the Anglo-French onto the Russians, but merely the customary Russian nature and attitude. This is nonsensical, because this trait cannot be detected through any thorough study of the Russian past.

As a matter of fact, it is an Anglo-French Freemasonic tradition to project their own image onto others; the supposedly brazen and forceful character of the Russians is a far cry if compared to that of the Franks and the Normans.

The projection of character and attitude onto another nation is usually carried out by selected individuals who are first initiated to Freemasonic rituals, then corrupted financially, and finally promoted politically in order to implement the choices and the directives of those whom they instinctively serve because all Freemasons are fully aware of the fact that their personal and professional success is exclusively due to their participation in the hierarchical, inhuman organization, and the ensuing blind submission to the orders of the superiors.

A 21st Century Victim Named Russia

The case study “Russia” can be explored either in Asia or in Europe. The period of communist regime did not change Russia and the complex game in anything; it simply intensified it by means of the absolutely Manichaeist division between “totalitarian East” and pseudo-democratic West.

In this regard, typical examples are

a)   Hungary (1956 – forceful push in short term tactics),

b)   Afghanistan (1979 – focus on small territorial benefits or acquisition),

c)   bad neighborhood relationships (China, Yugoslavia),

d)   lack of overhaul strategy (typically Anglo-French colonial policy pursued in Abyssinia in total disrespect of Lenin’s theory of Nations), and

e)   inability to prevent the rivals from expanding (substitution of England and France by America in several parts of the world; neo-colonial comeback of Paris and London).

The Soviet era was the period in which the Russian scarecrow functioned near perfection level. In the perestroika years, M. Gorbachev did his best to overcome the prejudicial myth, but as early as the Yeltsin years, the anti-Russian Anglo-French perfidy marked an astounding comeback. In the 90s, Russia lost all its chances to ever become member of the EU. This was achieved partly thanks to the indifference of the Russian Foreign Ministry where Russia’s freemasonic establishment (aligned with the prefab plutocrats and the Zionists) managed to place their members and agents who have been tasked to implement and promote the Freemasonic directives at the prejudice of their own country, which is important to them only if controlled by them and their masters — whom even they don’t know.

The rise of the Russian “kleptomania club” was instigated and promoted with Anglo-French and US capital controlled by Freemasonic and Zionist financers. They ended up forming a secluded oligarchic plutocracy, which depends totally on Western Freemasonic and Zionist support, advice and guidance. Thanks to the rise of this plutocratic circles, the Freemasonic order is again able to handle the situation in Russia and maneuver Russian politics, and more importantly, Russian foreign policy — something that was totally impossible at the times of Khrushchev.

Over the past 18 years, the Freemasonic — Zionist circles of Russia attempted to obtain full control of the country; they failed, but they still made a compromise deal that helps them exercise a critical impact. The deal was sealed by Medvedev’s election to the presidency.

Putin deployed a great effort to reorganize and modernize Russia, re-assert Moscow’s strength and presence, and bring the country to the forefront of the international affairs. Unfortunately, without understanding it, he played the same old game that was ascribed to Russia by the Anglo-French Freemasonry. He even failed to make a full comparison between the first decade of the 20th century and that of the 21st century in Russia and worldwide.

Today, Russia is fully instrumentalized against its own, natural interests. Engulfed in conflicts with Caucasus Muslims in Dagestan, Ingushetia and elsewhere, confused in its stance towards the three southern neighbours, Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan, driven to a position of Iran’s informal ally, obsessed with Poland, led to a standstill in its commitment to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Russia carried out one after the other almost all the tasks assigned to the “Brazen” Kremlin Masters by the Anglo-French Freemasonry.

Global Predominance: Main Targets of the Anglo-French Freemasonry

For the Moscow chief to avert a Freemasonic scheme against Russia, it is necessary to pertinently identify the main targets of the Anglo-French Freemasonry; they evolve around the following axes:

1.   Destruction of the faith and the religious belief (all religions are targeted)

2.   Discrediting of Christianity, and of the Catholic Church in particular

3.   Diffusion of immoral concepts and practices, such as abortion, gay marriage, adoption, evolutionism, human cloning

4.   Dismantlement of traditional Human values, notably the family as social cell

5.   Proliferation of materialistic concerns, concepts, and lifestyles

6.   Absolute dependency of the masses worldwide on technological gadgets and related practices, which leads to total control of everyone’s personal and social activities

7.   Destruction of the global capitalist system and instauration of a totalitarian socioeconomic system that will dwarf all previous systems in terms of man’s exploitation by man

8.   Increased tension between Muslim migrants and European citizens, terrible social disorder, extensive clashes between Muslims and Christians, and absolute chaos that will result in the imposition of a (supposedly pacifying) dictatorship supported by mass mind control technologies

9.   Socioeconomic, political, national and physical disintegration of the US

10.   Collapse of the present regime in Iran, Islamization of Turkey, and Middle Eastern Wars as generalization of the Palestinian — Zionist conflict

11.   Afflictions allover the world, involving great, man-made, natural, electro-magnetic and microbiological disasters in vast parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia

12.   European peace imposed on Middle East’s belligerent parts and subsequent annexation of the said territories by Europe, imposition of totalitarian order

13.   Destruction of Vatican — forceful disappearance of Christianity, Judaism and Islam throughout the tyrannical European state

14.   Escalated nuclear war between Europe and Russia, following territorial disputes

This eschatological perspective seems abysmal of nature, but to the top of the Freemasonic hierarchy it represents an end per se; it also encompasses the annihilation of the quasi-totality of the Mankind, and the survival of the Freemasonic hierarchy converted into cyborgs, i.e. cybernetic organisms whereby absolute fusion of the human and the robot will be effectuated. This is their vision of “eternal life”.

To outmaneuver this anti-human, anti-Christian, and anti-Russian plot, Moscow must act in striking opposition to Kremlin’s present practices. Only conceptual thinking and intention identification can help.

Otherwise, by directing a high-powered microwave weapon at an aircraft and by destroying its electronic system, the Russian oligarchs simply engulf their own country more deeply into the trap set by the Anglo-French Freemasonry.

The Assassination of Lech Aleksander Kaczyn’ski

Many people are in mysteries and others doubt about the tragic end of one of the greater Europeans of the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century. But what is there to doubt about? The extremely advanced high tech weapons that are nowadays available for use by the US, Russian, French, English, Chinese and other military make the case of an air plane crash look as a minor detail. Entire cities can be totally disabled within seconds, and without the use of nuclear weapons.

The high-powered microwave weapons constitute only one type of advanced weaponry, and they are definitely easy of use. By creating a burst of electro-magnetic energy and by aptly directing it at an enemy’s electronics, an operations room can put out of order every electronic system in an entire city, not just a plane. With the electronic devices of an air plane burnt out much like a lightning strike destroys home appliances, the plane crash is a matter of seconds.

High powered microwave weapons were a field of systematic research and exploration already at the times of Soviet Union. Before already 10 years, the New Scientist made of the subject an informative, introductory article for the general public under the title “Just a normal town” http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16722453.900-just-a-normal-town.html). Common sense imposes the assumption of further advance, deeper exploration and effective usability.

Recently, Roxana Tiron, in “Microwave Missiles: High-Energy Weapons in the Air Force” (http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/4319720), wrote about the following US projects:

“Active Electronically Scanned Array Radar: AESA radars are made to scan the horizon for threats. However, if radio energy is concentrated on one spot, the radar can scramble the electronics of targets. U.S. warplanes currently carry the AESA radar, but officials do not speak publicly about their electronic warfare capabilities”.

Today, to question about the technical ability of the technologically advanced military to produce an air plane crash, leaving almost no trace, is merely a matter of naivety. Once the plausibility is confirmed, the only points we have to consider are the motives of, and the disposition to undertake, a similar act.

The disposition to kill that so typically characterizes the top of the inhuman Freemasonic hierarchy is highlighted by the world we are living in; the physical elimination of the opponents who can put serious obstacles to the global dominance of the Apostate Freemasonic lodge is considered as normal act by the humanoids who sold their soul to Satan and initiated in the evil rites of the Apostasy.

The global Freemasonry is the decision-making center of every abomination perpetrated in our days; paranoid and self-dehumanized, all the members, from the lowest to the highest, of the evil order consider as their own “right” to perpetrate any act needed in order to reach their target.

Addicted to homicide, undisturbed by genocides, today’s Apostate Freemasons are obsessed with power, immorality and ignominy. Respecting no rules, accepting no limits, and feeling no restrain, today’s Freemasons constitute the world’s most professional, unrepentant, serial gangsters. This ominous reality explains all crimes and abnormalities, troubles and calamities that have befallen on our world.

To truly understand our world’s realities, one must therefore presume that, practically speaking, any influential person in an official position who opposes the aforementioned apocalyptic targets of the Apostate Freemasonic lodge is exposed to reprisals that may escalate up to physical elimination.

In today’s world, “still uncontrolled” means “already targeted”.

The Motives of Lech Aleksander Kaczyn’ski’s Assassins

Through the aforementioned, it is clear that the heroic president of Poland was exposed to reprisals because he opposed the evil Freemasonic plan across-the-board. This is the reason for which the world’s Freemasonic mass media from Le Monde to the Times were greatly satisfied with, if not jubilant for, his assassination.

More precisely, Lech Kaczyn’ski

1 - was the prototype of a morally solid statesman, whereas the Freemasonry-promoted politicians are all corrupted individuals with no morals, moral principles or constrains, because they are more easily maneuverable in this way

2 - was an a adamant supporter of the Polish national identity, cultural integrity, historical individuality, and religious reality, considering them all as great values that should not be sacrificed in the altar of the European Union’s basic goals, nor in the attempted monstrous disfigurement of all the European nations

3 - was a staunch supporter of the Christian nature of the European History, which whenever not viciously denied, is dishonestly portrayed, and the Christian values deliberately forgotten

4 – was a strong political opponent of the Freemasonic effort to demolish the foundations of the European Humanism by introducing Satanic theories portrayed as scientific truth (evolutionism), derelict systems (materialism, agnosticism, atheism, etc.) and debased practices under the schemes of liberalism and libertarianism (abortion, gay marriage, etc.)

5 - opposed the financial Freemasonic — Zionist plot, which through tricks like consumerism and excessive spending makes entire nations become indebted to hidden financers or even go bankrupt (and thus obediently implement the directives of their lenders)

6 - contested the concept of Euro-federalism that has been so aptly promoted by the hidden Paris — London axis, and should thus have been first rejected by Germany (Europe’s less free and most compactly controlled country that is left without the slightest trace of national independence, following the imposition of a genuinely un-German political system)

Even after Lech Kaczyn’ski’s assassination, the disreputable Freemasonic newspaper Le Figaro dared publish inflammatory libels, showing no respect to a defunct person. The title of an article described the Polish hero and president as “militant president and European troublemaker“, and his opposition to the French — German hegemony over Europe was depicted as almost a reproduction of the primordial sin.

Yet, Kaczyn’ski’s opposition to the so-called French – German axis was a minimal rebuttal of the EU corrupt practices. It was not a complete unmasking but a steadfast reinforcement of an informal front made by diverse statesmen of several small countries, who realize that there is a persistent and malignant effort to forcefully align the small countries policies with the needs of the “giants”.

The situation is however much more perplex, and the German nation should make of Lech Kaczyn’ski their own hero, because Germans have been manipulated worse than any other European nation by means of tyrannical imposition of a German political elite that is genuinely un-German in terms of socioeconomic and sociopolitical ideals. This means that Berlin, despite its tremendous economic strength, is reduced to a position of convenient, minor ally of the French, useful only to pay for policies that are indifferent or even calamitous for the German nation.

More than Poland, Germany needs today another Lech Kaczyn’ski.

7 - combated the criminal Freemasonic effort to separate the defense system of EU from that of the US

As a matter of fact, there is nothing wrong in the concept itself, but an independent European defense system must a) represent the defense interests of all the EU member states — which automatically means rejection of the Anglo-French defense concepts –, b) promote world peace, and c) either fully incorporate or fully deter Russia.

8 - struggled against the implementation and the promotion of the Brazen Russian Game, by demanding measures that totally dismantle the Freemasonic trickery. If Russia’s neuralgic center can be demolished within less than 10 or even 5 minutes, the Brazen Russian becomes an impossible game.

This earned Lech Kaczyn’ski the qualification of “russophobe” but this ludicrous name-calling tactics simply illuminates the preliminary work undertaken by the evil, Freemasonic mass media against the long targeted Polish President.

9 - rejected the calamitous Freemasonic felony of “Migrant Workers” in Europe because, after six decades of Freemasonic tyranny over Europe, the true proportions of the scheme have been revealed, and many today clearly understand that, due to their impossibility to be assimilated in the system, the Muslim migrant workers in Europe have become the explosive stuff that the Freemasonic tyrants will use to instigate clashes, disorder, white terror, and the subsequent absolutist tyranny.

The sustainability of such a project could have been assessed as nil from the beginning. Europe is very different from America; the US was not devoid of thorny problems either (racism, Civil War); Muslims are still scarce in America; and last but not least, the migration of the Muslims for economic — professional reasons is totally unacceptable in Islam and consists in a flagrant violation of the basic rules and the historical practices of the Islamic world. As expected, the Satanic sheikhs of Islam, who represent a viciously composed and absolutely fake system of Islamic theology, did not oppose this practice, because they are the criminal accomplices of tyrants and pseudo-kings imposed on all the colonized Muslim countries because of Freemasonic Anglo-French interference.

This earned Lech Kaczyn’ski the qualification of “xenophobe” but this shameful name-calling tactics merely demonstrates the preparatory work carried out by the Freemasonic mass media in view of the assassination, which seems to have been planned long ago.

Lech Kaczyn’ski was not a xenophobic statesman; actually, the only real xenophobes are the humanophobic Freemasons who know very well the incommensurable extent of their inhumanity. They know that they cannot face a morally integer human being and straightforwardly narrate their deeds, rites, goals, and endeavours. The reason is simple; the world would asphyxiate from their contamination.

The proof that this assessment is true is plain; if this assessment is wrong, all their members’ oaths of secrecy must be cancelled, and every Freemason must reveal his identity in public. Do they dare do so?

Conclusion

In a world accursed with detrimental injustices, accustomed with arrogance, materialism, and immorality, and interwoven with evilness, secrecy and machination, whereby the declared will of people is disregarded, the politicians’ promises are never kept, and the numerous ongoing genocides do not perturb the corrupt ruling elite, the assassination of some dozens of opponents is a minor issue for the perpetrators of all the aforementioned acts and the sustainers of the above described situation.

One should be mentally defective to possibly imagine that coincidences of that scale can occur today for this or that hypothetical reason; one should be totally demented to assume that those, who so calmly disregard so many ongoing genocides, would feel restrained to commit an act this ugly.

It matters truly little who has done it; most probably, the Russians have. However, in similar cases, what truly matters is who gave the order.

And for this, because of the perfectly identified purposes, intentions, policies and goals of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge, due to the compact control exercised by the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge on the regimes of Paris and London, thanks to the incessant, negative Anglo-French attitudes toward (and exasperation against) Poland’s assassinated president, and by reason of the repeatedly attested assassinations of menacing (native or foreign) opponents, we can conclude that the Anglo-French intelligence services passed a note onto their Russian counterparts that no major trouble would occur, if a (difficult to detect) assassination took place. It is crystal clear that the Russians would not have undertaken this act without prior notice that there would be no consequence.

Both accomplices had the means, the motive, the opportunity, and what is more, the disposition to kill.

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

The Big Bang Treaty: Fox News no longer feels the need to accurately report on President Obama’s nuclear arms treaty with Russia.

The Fox ‘News’ Network a.k.a The Republican Propaganda Network, constantly and misleadingly disparages Obama and his administration in its supposedly straight reporting. Comedian Jon Stewart incisively, exposes the LYING IDIOTS at Fox News. [ VIDEO BELOW ]

| More Lies From Fox — Smears, Doctored Videos, GOP Talking Points |

Visionary Asshole Newt Gingrich: Obama is “the most radical president in American history“

Ding-Bat Gretchen Carlson likes Palin’s nuke/playground punch analogy because people “get” it. [ Obama Will Not Take Any 'Nuclear' Advice From Palin ]

Fox whines that Obama was “not presidential” in taking “a shot” at Palin over her nuclear policy experience

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

   Columnist – John Sammon
Why does North Korea do this?

Because it works.

North Korea’s testing of a nuclear weapon is the same old stick and carrot approach North Korea always uses. Again and again. They get away with it. Again and again.

Each time they do, it’s like a repeat, an exact copy of the way they did it before, the last crisis they caused, just the same way. A repeat. Like another little Munich crisis, recalling when gullible European leaders attempted to reason with and appease Hitler, and in selling away the sovereignty of Czechoslovakia, brought them all another step closer to war.

Here’s how it works.

Every time.

A.    North Korea announces to the world it will test a nuclear weapon, or a delivery system for the weapon (missile).

B.    The world, four-fifths of it, protests. Nothing is done.

C.    Despite protests, North Korea tests the weapon, or missile, which works better (more improved) every time.

D.    The world, four-fifths of it, protests again, after the test.

E.    North Korea then threatens war (the stick in the stick and carrot) if economic sanctions are taken against it.

F.    China and Russia veto possible economic embargo action by the UN against their former client state (North Korea).

G.    North Korea gets away with it, and keeps building a bomb and a missile to deliver it.

H.    When things get tense to the breaking point, sometimes, North Korea makes some kind of vague statement about the desire for peace, and renewed talks, even though they have violated past agreements with the precision of a Swiss clock (that’s the carrot in the stick and carrot).

Meanwhile, the idiotic policy of the former moronic president, George Bush, to seek a winless 40-year war in the Middle East by fighting ragged insurgents who don’t have a bomb, and ignore a country that is openly building one in violation of all previous agreements, continues to suck up lives and treasure and focus.

The legacy of the moron Bush was to fixate on the wrong enemy. If we ignore the criminal immorality of his regime and look at it strategically, Bush was the worst strategist since Benito Mussolini.

It makes sense. Doesn’t it make sense? Let’s ignore the gravest threat to world peace in the world and instead waste time, money and lives trying to pry vagabonds out of mountain caves in rural Afghanistan.

North Korea advances step by step.

The trump cards are Russia and China. Just as they did during the Korean War in 1951, Russia and China give North Korea power, by vetoing any attempt at the UN to rein in the mad dog (North Korea) by using economic or embargo sanctions.

Successive presidents starting with Richard Nixon and including Bill Clinton and the Bush boys have deluded themselves that Russia and China are our friends, when they are not. They are dictatorships masquerading as democracies.

They will continue to block any opposition to North Korea in the UN. The lunatic foaming at the mouth in Pyongyang knows this.

What will Obama do? That’s going to be interesting to see.

I predict a new to-the-brink-of-Armageddon crisis over North Korea that will be much like the 1962 Cuban Missile crisis, when the world came within a hair’s breath of turning itself into fused glass. Only this time, the finger on the trigger (the North Korean finger) will be more unstable than Khrushchev was in 1962.

On that note, to readers of Politicalarticles.net, I say, happy Memorial Day.

CNN: S. Korea to join a U.S.-led effort to crack down on trafficking in WMDs, while U.N. Security Council condemns nuclear test as a “clear violation” of U.N. resolutions. Ally China urges North Korea to return to disarmament talks. United States says North Korea’s nuclear test was “grave violation” of law. [ READ MORE ]

————————————————————————————————————————————————-

————————————————————————————————————————————————-