Some angry comments I gathered on the Internet:

“Obama will NOT get my vote, and one step more,” Ellen Thorp, a 59-year-old flight attendant from Houston told me. “I have been a Democrat for 38 years. As of today, I am registering as an independent. Yee Haw!”

Jean B. Grillo, an “over 50″ writer in lower Manhattan, was pretty straightforward: “I am so tired as a white, ultra-liberal, McGovern-voting, civil-rights marching, anti-war fighting highly educated professional woman who totally supports Hillary Clinton to be attacked and vilified as racist and or dumb.”

Shauna Morris, a 44-year-old lawyer from Largo, Fla., said, “I am upper-middle class, and I still can’t stand him — and it has nothing to do with race, believe me.”

“Many of us feel slighted,” said Lynn Eyrich Harvey, 76, from Los Gatos, Calif. “We feel that years of supporting the party is unimportant, that we are to sit down and shut up — but be sure to vote Democratic in November.”

“How Obama’s campaign has treated Hillary will not be forgotten,” Janet Rogers, 55, who runs a Bed and Breakfast in Medina, Ohio. “I will vote for McCain if Hillary is not the nominee. My husband and friends all feel the same way.”

.
.
.
.
.

LOL!

If you look at my postings on this blog, one thing is clear — I do not dislike Hillary as a person. I do dislike her tactics — race-baiting and so forth…

If she had beaten Obama fairly, I would have supported her unconditionally — for Republicans are FILTHY SLIME no human being in their right mind should support.

Hillary was not beaten by Obama with the help of the press for she had “FOX ‘Bigot’ News” plus numerous right-wing radio pundits pontificating to whites “frightened of black men” working for her, while MSNBC and left-wing radio favored Obama.

She just lost, plain and simple — to a better prepared candidate. Her arrogance, disorganization, lack of foresight and sense of entitlement did her in…and here are some more reasons why she lost.

…and by the way, there are millions of females, especially younger ones supporting Obama….why not you?

This prompts me to ask the question: “What the heck is the matter with these women?“…Obama has been a gentleman all through!

It seems to me that some of these women have taken the “I get the house and the children ’syndrome,’” a common divorce settlement in American courts too far!

…or is it Feminism taken too far? Here is something to chew on.

Obama has his work cut out for him — calming down millions of irate, sometimes dumb and racist white women.

It will be a very difficult task after the deranged narcissism exhibited by Ma. Clinton during this just concluded “Silly” primary season!

Ladies, remember to THINK before you cast your ballot in November — Your only other options will be McDUMB, McWarMonger, McSAME, McBUSH, McTHUG, McReTHUGlican and McBOMB….who sincerely believe in the following: click here to read

The just concluded democratic primary was not an episode of “Divorce Court,” rather it was a contest leading to the election of the most “powerful person” in the world — Obama floored the Clinton machine amidst “assassination threats,” blatant racism and rampant mis-information — fired from all directions, and he fully deserves to compete in the grand finale — in November, against ReTHUGlican John McBOMB.

By the way, Hillary gave a very strong speech today, and hopefully she will follow up to help Obama get elected.

If she follows up effectively, all will be forgiven. If she doesn’t and Obama is defeated because of her “White Female” core constituency — she better remember that in 2012(if she decides to run again) she may experience multiple episodes of “Angry Black Females,” “Angry Black Men,” “Angry Left-Wing Liberals” and “Angry Young Males and Females - White & Black” — Obama’s core constituency.

My guns are now aimed squarely at the forehead of McDUMB ….who by the way, and I sincerely believe, is not a bad man, but the thought of victory for Right-Wing ReTHUGlicanism just makes me want to puke!

Popularity: 27% [?]

With hundreds of White Women screaming murder, the Democratic Party Rules Committee today dealt a severe blow to Hillary “Napoleon” Clinton.

Hillary wanted the whole nine yards of Michigan and another nine of Florida, irrespective of the DNC rules that were set up very clearly and agreed upon by both campaigns before the beginning of the primaries.

In other words, she wants to steal this nomination by hook or crook — including inciting White Women by invoking baseless charges of “Sexism” by the Obama campaign, and by race-baiting.

It has not and will not work Ma. Clinton!

The rulings (by vote) by the DNC today prompted Hillary’s chief delegate Harold Ickes to angrily state: “There’s been a lot of talk about party unity–let’s all come together, and put our arms around each other,” said Ickes, who is also a member of the Rules Committee that approved the deal. “I submit to you ladies and gentlemen, hijacking four delegates … is not a good way to start down the path of party unity,” adding that Clinton had instructed him to reserve her right to appeal the matter to the Democrats’ credentials committee, at the party’s convention in August.

Obama picked up a total of 32 delegates in Michigan, including super delegates who have already committed, and 36 in Florida, for a total of 2,052. Hillary Clinton correspondingly picked up 38 in Michigan and 56.5 in Florida, for a total of 1,877.5.

To Hillary I say:

It’s Over ……PERIOD!!

The party of Clinton is now Obama’s party, whether you like it or not!

You and Bill are nothing but crooks who think that the presidency of The United States is an entitlement, and even a thoroughbred black man like Obama has no business grabbing “what belongs to you.” [see Michael Pfleger video below]

Hillary…..I hope to live to see a woman become the president of The United States someday — that woman will NOT be you. You are nothing but a THUG, in the mode of the “vicious Hyenas” who call themselves Republicans a.k.a ReTHUGlicans.

Go home Hillary — and bake cookies and have tea with Bill, for that’s a sure way of keeping tabs on his “philandering self.”

The FAT LADY has sung!

—————————————

Meanwhile, Sen. Barack Obama has quit his controversial congregation, Trinity United Church of Christ, in Chicago, campaign spokesman Bill Burton said Saturday.

Inflammatory sermons by the church’s longtime pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., forced Obama to initially defend – then denounce – his former spiritual mentor.

Then this week, Obama had to distance himself from another minister preaching at Trinity, the Rev. Michael Pfleger, who last Sunday made comments that seemed to accuse Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) of acting “entitled” because she is white…[MORE]

Rev. Michael Pfleger Mocks Hillary Clinton

Halleluhya Rev!

REFERENCES:

1. The FIX — Michigan: A Done Deal But Bitterness Lingers
2. The D.N.C. Deliberates
3. Obama Quits His Church

Popularity: 22% [?]

“My husband did not wrap up the nomination until June …… “Bobby Kennedy Was Assassinated In June” — Vince Foster Is Rolling In His Grave!

SPECIAL COMMENT BY KEITH OLBERMANN
Olbermann: Hillary Clinton — ‘You Invoked A Nightmare’…

REACTIONS:

• Time: “Strange And Tasteless”…


• Washington Post: “At Best A Poorly Chosen Example”…


• Andrew Sullivan: Clinton Just Imploded…


• Howard Fineman: “A Campaign That Probably Needs To Be Put Out Of Its Misery Real Soon”…


• New York Times: Clinton’s Reference to Slaying of Robert Kennedy Stirs Uproar

MY SPECIAL COMMENT

[Pending]

REFERENCES:

1. Government Cover-ups: Vince Foster
2. The Death of Vincent Foster — Evidence Of A Cover-up
3. The Cover-Up Of Vince Foster’s Murder Gets Stranger and Stranger
4. Vince Foster on Wikipedia

Popularity: 31% [?]

By: Jonah Goldberg

True or not, the Clinton campaign has been accused of playing the race card. The irony here, of course, is that Bill and Hillary only have themselves to blame for employing the kinds of political tactics now being used against them.

As the Barack and Hillary Show extended its tour to such off-off-off Broadway primary states as Indiana and North Carolina (coming soon to Puerto Rico!), it was inevitable that both sides would dust off the "playing the race card" script.

Recently, Bill Clinton was asked whether he had played the race card when he compared Barack Obama’s South Carolina victory to Jesse Jackson’s in 1984 and 1988. "No," he said in one of his typical outbursts of enraged self-pity. "I think that they played the race card on me, and we now know … that they planned to do it all along." Then Clinton added to an aide — without realizing he was being recorded — "I don’t think I should take any s—- from anybody on that, do you?"Oh, the ironies. First, Clinton’s initial comments were entirely valid. Obama boasts enormous black support, more than 90%, and that’s what put him (and Jackson)over the top in South Carolina. Second, while it’s arguable that the Clinton campaign has, at the margins, played the race card against Obama, it’s hardly been with much gusto, effectiveness or racism.

Where’s the racism?

Indeed, Obama’s spinners must be yoga masters considering how far they have to stretch to make their case. Betsy Reed, of the left-wing magazine The Nation, cites the Clinton campaign’s reference to Obama’s past drug use (raised most prominently by black Clinton surrogate Bob Johnson) and Bill’s belittling of Obama’s claims of anti-war purity as a "fairy tale" as examples of invidious racial politics.

Huh? Bill Clinton’s marijuana use was an issue in 1992 and, in 2000, the press went bonkers over allegations that George W. Bush had used drugs long ago. So why should it be racist to mention Obama’s even more significant drug use? Likewise, the use of the phrase "fairy tale" wasn’t racial. Even Hillary’s entirely valid, but now-infamous, observation that it was Lyndon Johnson, not Martin Luther King Jr., who secured passage of the Civil Rights Act can be described as racist only if the standard for racism is reduced to anything that hurts Obama. Dubbing inconvenient truths as "racist" is poisonous to U.S. politics. Which is why I have so little sympathy for the Clintons because it was the Clintons themselves who mainstreamed crying racism (or sexism or, in the case of Chinese fundraising scandals, anti-Chinese sentiment) in response to criticism.

Throughout his tenure as both "the first feminist" and "first black" president, Clinton Inc. routinely ascribed political opposition to bigotry. At a conference on race in 1997, Bill Clinton famously wheeled on Harvard scholar Abigail Thernstrom
— a high-minded critic of racial quotas — and bullied her with the question: "Do you favor the United States Army abolishing the affirmative action program that produced Colin Powell? Yes or no?" The tactic was no less brilliant for its cynical dishonesty. (Among the problems with Clinton’s ambush: Powell didn’t benefit from any affirmative action programs, which weren’t in place when he joined the Army nor even when he became a general.)

In 1999, when the Senate rejected his nominee for a Missouri judgeship, Clinton exclaimed that "the Republican-controlled Senate is adding credence to the perceptions that they treat women and minority judicial nominees unfairly." The Clintonites reflexively lamented how "angry white men" were standing in the way of progress, and even resorting to violence. After the Oklahoma City bombing, Clinton fingered the real culprit: Rush Limbaugh.

Then, of course, there was Bill Clinton’s double-dealing of the race card during his impeachment struggle. As my National Review colleague Jay Nordlinger noted at the time, "Whenever Clinton gets into trouble, he reaches for black people, as if for a shield."

Impeachment defense

The first weekend of the Lewinsky scandal, Clinton suddenly invited his old nemesis Jackson to become the family’s spiritual adviser. He summoned black pastors, radio personalities and a battalion of black lawyers. Slowly — but oh so deliberately — the message went forth: Impeaching the first black president was racist. Rep. Charlie Rangel compared him to Martin Luther King. In response to the Starr report, Rep. Maxine Waters said that she was "here in the name of my slave ancestors" to thwart the racist assault on this honorary black man. When asked on BET whether Republicans wanted him impeached because of his affinity for blacks, Clinton responded, "It may be," wink wink, "that that’s a source of anger and animosity toward me."

Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift, the Clinton’s reliable water-carrier, got the memo, saying of the all-white Republican impeachment handlers, "I mean frankly, all they were missing was white sheets. They’re like night riders going over. This is bigger than Bill Clinton."

Hillary Clinton played similar games, of course, insinuating sexism when convenient. But even if she didn’t, it’s worth remembering that she wants credit for being something akin to a co-president in the ’90s. Fine, it’s her record, too.

It’s no wonder the Clintons don’t like it when Obama and his supporters cynically complain that attacks on him are racially motivated; they’re dealing his own race card back at him. This surely stings as Bill no doubt sees this as ingratitude from a constituency he has long taken for granted. And we’d all be better off if this card were tossed from the deck. But make no mistake: Nobody should shed any tears for the Clintons.

Popularity: 36% [?]