HILLARY’S LIST OF LIES 希拉里的名單的謊言
By通過 DICK MORRIS 迪克莫里斯
Published on TheHill.com on March 25, 2008.發布時間thehill.com對2008年3月25日。
The USA Today/Gallup survey clearly explains why Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (DN.Y.) is losing.今日美國/蓋洛普調查清楚解釋了為什麼參議員希拉里克林頓（ dn.y. ）正在失去。 Asked whether the candidates were “honest and trustworthy,” Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) won with 67 percent, with Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) right behind him at 63.詢問候選人“誠實守信， ”參議員麥凱恩（ r-ariz. ）韓元與67 ％ ，與參議員巴拉克奧巴馬（ d-ill. ）的權利，他身後在63 。 Hillary scored only 44 percent, the lowest rating for any candidate for any attribute in the poll.希拉里的成績只有44 ％ ，最低得分為任何候選人的任何屬性，在民意調查。
Hillary simply cannot tell the truth. 希拉里根本無法說出真相。 Here’s her scorecard: 在這裡她的記分卡：
Admitted Lies 承認謊言
• Chelsea was jogging around the Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. •切爾西是慢跑，圍繞貿易中心對2001年9月11日。 (She was in bed watching it on TV.) （她在床上看它在電視上） 。
• Hillary was named after Sir Edmund Hillary. •希拉里被任命後，主席先生，愛德蒙希拉里。 (She admitted she was wrong. He climbed Mt. Everest five years after her birth.) （她承認她是錯誤的，他爬上山，珠穆朗瑪峰五年後，她出生） 。
• She was under sniper fire in Bosnia. •她是下狙擊火力在波斯尼亞。 (A girl presented her with flowers at the foot of the ramp.) （一女孩介紹了她的鮮花在腳下的坡道） 。
• She learned in The Wall Street Journal how to make a killing in the futures market. •據悉，她在華爾街日報如何使殺人在期貨市場。 (It didn’t cover the market back then.) （這並不包括市場，然後回） 。
Whoppers She Won’t Confess To whoppers ，她不會承認
• She didn’t know about the FALN pardons. •她不知道有關faln赦免。
• She didn’t know that her brothers were being paid to get pardons that Clinton granted. •她不知道，她的兄弟被支付給獲得赦免，克林頓是理所當然的。
• Taking the White House gifts was a clerical error. •考慮白宮的禮物是一個文書上的錯誤。
• She didn’t know that her staff would fire the travel office staff after she told them to do so. •她不知道她的工作人員將消防旅行辦事處的工作人員後，她告訴他們這樣做。
• She didn’t know that the Peter Paul fundraiser in Hollywood in 2000 cost $700,000 more than she reported it had. •她不知道該彼得保羅籌款在好萊塢在2000年的成本七十點零萬美元多於她報告了。
• She opposed NAFTA at the time. •她反對北美自由貿易協定在時間。
• She was instrumental in the Irish peace process. •她是儀器在愛爾蘭的和平進程。
• She urged Bill to intervene in Rwanda. •她促請條例草案進行干預，在盧旺達。
• She played a role in the ’90s economic recovery. •她發揮了作用，在九十年代，經濟復甦的步伐。
• The billing records showed up on their own. •帳單紀錄顯示了他們自己。
• She thought Bill was innocent when the Monica scandal broke. •她認為條例草案是無辜的，當莫尼卡醜聞爆發。
• She was always a Yankees fan. •她一直是紐約洋基隊範。
• She had nothing to do with the New Square Hasidic pardons (after they voted for her 1,400-12 and she attended a meeting at the White House about the pardons). •她已完全不符合新廣場哈西德派赦免（後，他們投贊成票，她1400年至1412年，她出席了會議，在白宮有關赦免） 。
• She negotiated for the release of refugees in Macedonia (who were released the day before she got there). •她談判，要求釋放難民在馬其頓（誰被釋放的前一天，她有） 。
With a record like that, is it any wonder that we suspect her of being less than honest and straightforward? 與創紀錄的一樣，是任何難怪我們懷疑她被少於誠實和直接的呢？
Why has McCain jumped out to a nine-point lead over Obama and a seven-point lead over Hillary in the latest Rasmussen poll?為什麼麥凱恩跳出來1 9分的領先優勢，超過奧巴馬和7分的領先優勢，超過希拉里在最新的拉斯姆森調查？ OK, Obama has had the Rev. Wright mess on his hands.確定，奧巴馬已牧師賴特一塌糊塗，他的手。 And Hillary has come in for her share of negatives, like the Richardson endorsement of Obama and the denouement of her latest lie — that she endured sniper fire during a trip to Bosnia.和希拉里已經在為她的份額底片一樣，理查森贊同奧巴馬和denouement她最新的謊言-她經歷了狙擊火力在訪問波斯尼亞。 But why has McCain gained so much in so short a period of time?但為何麥凱恩獲得了這麼多，在這麼短的時間內呢？ Most polls had the general election tied two weeks ago.大部分民調換屆選舉綁在兩個星期前。
McCain’s virtues require a contrast in order to stand out.麥凱恩的美德，需要一個對比，以便站出來。 His strength, integrity, solidity and dependability all are essentially passive virtues, which shine only by contrast with others.他的實力，完整，堅固和可靠性都基本上是被動的美德，這光芒不僅相比之下與他人。 Now that Obama and Hillary are offering images that are much weaker, less honest, and less solid and dependable, good old John McCain looks that much better as he tours Iraq and Israel while the Democrats rip one another apart.現在奧巴馬和希拉里提供的圖像是弱得多，那麼誠實，那麼堅實和可靠的，良好的老麥凱恩看來好得多，因為他旅行團的伊拉克和以色列，而民主黨人擷取一另一除了。
It took Nixon for us to appreciate Jimmy Carter’s simple honesty.它採取了尼克松為我們欣賞卡特的簡單，清正廉明的作風。 It took Clinton and Monica for us to value George W. Bush’s personal character.它採取了克林頓和莫尼卡為我們的價值布什的個人性格。 And it takes the unseemly battle among the Democrats for us to give John McCain his due.並採取恰當的戰鬥之間的同盟，我們給麥凱恩，他因。
When Obama faces McCain in the general election (not if but when) the legacy of the Wright scandal will not be to question Obama’s patriotism or love of America.當奧巴馬面臨麥凱恩在換屆選舉（如果不出意外的話，但時）的遺產懷特醜聞將不會對問題奧巴馬的愛國主義或愛美利堅合眾國。 It will be to ask if he has the right stuff (pardon the pun).它會問，如果他有正確的東西（原諒雙關語） 。
The largest gap between McCain and Obama in the most recent USA Today/Gallup Poll was on the trait of leadership.最大的差距，麥凱恩和奧巴馬在最近期的今日美國報/蓋洛普的調查是有關性狀的領導。 Asked if each man was a “strong, decisive leader,” 69 percent felt that the description fit McCain while only 56 percent thought it would apply to Obama.問如果每個人是一個“強有力的，果斷的領導人， ” 69 ％認為合適的描述麥凱恩，而只有56 ％ ，認為這將適用於奧巴馬。 (61 percent said it of Hillary.) Obama has looked weak handling the Rev. Wright controversy. （ 61 ％的人表示，它的希拉里） 。奧巴馬曾研究薄弱，處理牧師賴特的爭議。 His labored explanation of why he attacks the sin but loves the sinner comes across as elegant but, at the same time, feeble.他labored解釋為什麼他攻擊單，但愛罪人遇到作為優雅，但在同一時間內，軟弱無力。 Obama’s reluctance to trade punches with his opponents makes us wonder if he could trade them with bin Laden or Ahmadinejad.奧巴馬的磁阻貿易重拳與他的對手，使我們不知道如果他能貿易他們與拉登或內賈德。 We have no doubt that McCain would gladly come to blows and would represent us well, but about Obama we are not so sure.我們毫無疑問，麥凱恩會很樂意來的衝擊，並會代表我們，良好，但約奧巴馬我們不是那麼肯定。
SATIRE: Bosnian Leader Recalls Having to Duck and Run On His Visit to The Clinton White House — ““IT WAS IN 1998, JUST AFTER THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL BROKE, AND THE POTS AND PANS WERE FLYING LIKE SERBIAN ARTILLERY SHELLS.” … More Laughs From 諷刺：波黑領導人回顧不必鴨和運行對他的訪問，克林頓在白宮 -“ ”它是在1 998年，剛剛結束萊溫斯基醜聞爆發，以及鍋子，水壺等飛行一樣，塞爾維亞砲彈。 “ … …更笑說，從 SatiricalPolitical.com satiricalpolitical.com
Popularity: 36% [人氣： 36 ％ [ ? ？ ] ]
Sphere: Related Content 領域：相關內容
March 29th, 2008 at 4:38 pm 2008年3月29日在下午4時38分
“Why do I have to keep proving to people that I am not a liar?!” -Hillary Clinton, 2000 “為什麼我要繼續證明，人民，我不是一個說謊者？ ！ ” -希拉里， 2000年
Truth is, Hillary Clinton lies.事實是，希拉里克林頓的謊言。 And, Mr. and Mrs. Clinton’s list of lies will provide journalistic fodder for decades.和，先生和夫人克林頓的名單，在於將提供新聞飼料數十年之久。 However, thanks to DNA, Internet, and other technologies, many of their misdeeds have already come to light, with more on the way.不過，由於DNA的，互聯網和其他技術，它們的許多行為已經來輕，更對未來路向。 Although the Clintons continue to lie, thank goodness for that.雖然克林頓繼續說謊，感謝善為。 She’s going to get caught; just you wait and see:她的去陷入;剛才您拭目以待： http://theseedsof9-11.com
Ps.保安局常任秘書長。 The site gets hacked from time to time.該網站所獲得的砍死會不時作出修訂。 Should you suspect this may be the case, please revisit it soon, as I strive to deliver the message.如果您懷疑這可能是這種情況，請盡快重新審視它，正如我努力傳送訊息。
March 29th, 2008 at 4:50 pm 2008年3月29日在下午4時50分
Welcome Peggy!歡迎林貝聿嘉！
I get into serious arguments with my female friends all the time because of Clinton.我得到成嚴重的論據與我的女性朋友，所有的時間，因為克林頓。
The truth is that she is an appendage of her husband Bill — Without him she would be nobody.事實的真相是，她是一個附庸丈夫的條例草案-沒有他，她將沒有人。 We need a self-made woman and not the other way round.我們需要一個自製女子，而不是其他方式輪。 Here is an這裡是一 example of what I am talking about 的例子，我所說的 . 。
I have no quarrel with a woman becoming president — just not this one.我沒有吵架，與一名女子成為總統-不只是這一個。 She is hopelessly phony, and a Clinton in the white house is a magnet for massive gridlock — just what we do not need after George ‘The Idiot’ messed up America for 8 years.她是假的絕望，和克林頓在白宮的是一個巨大的磁鐵困局-究竟是什麼我們並不需要後，喬治'白痴'搞砸，美國為八年。
Come back often Peggy.回來往往林貝聿嘉。